Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Changing law and clinical dilemmas

W D Weitzel

    The American Journal of Psychiatry
    |March 1, 1977
    PubMed
    Summary

    This case study explores the ethical challenges of treating suicidal patients with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) when consent is unclear. It highlights the conflict between the right to treatment and the right to refuse treatment in psychiatric care.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Diagnostic assessment of individuals with misleading behaviors.

    The Journal of the Kentucky Medical Association·1987
    Same author

    Absence of privilege.

    The Journal of the Kentucky Medical Association·1986
    Same author

    Involuntary outpatient psychiatric care: a timely innovation.

    The Journal of the Kentucky Medical Association·1984
    Same author

    Inappropriate ADH secretion: the role of drug re-challenge.

    Psychosomatics·1980
    Same author

    L'illusion de Capgras--syndrome or phenomenon?

    The Journal of the Kentucky Medical Association·1980
    Same author

    Misidentification syndromes.

    The American journal of psychiatry·1980

    Area of Science:

    • Psychiatry
    • Medical Ethics
    • Neuroscience

    Background:

    • Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a potent treatment for severe depression.
    • Involuntary commitment procedures raise complex ethical and legal questions regarding patient autonomy.
    • Conflicting legal principles, such as the right to treatment versus the right to refuse treatment, complicate clinical decision-making.

    Observation:

    • A case is presented where a severely depressed, suicidal patient received ECT.
    • The patient had refused consent, and involuntary commitment procedures were pending at the time of treatment.
    • This situation created significant professional and ethical dilemmas for the treating psychiatrists.

    Findings:

    • The case underscores the tension between a patient's right to refuse treatment and the clinician's duty to provide life-saving interventions.
    • Legal principles governing psychiatric treatment can be ambiguous and sometimes contradictory.
    • Psychiatric practice requires careful navigation of these complex legal and ethical landscapes.

    Implications:

    • There is a need for clearer legal and ethical guidelines regarding patient consent for ECT, especially in involuntary commitment contexts.
    • Psychiatrists must be aware of and prepared to address the legal complexities surrounding patient rights.
    • Seeking legal counsel is crucial for psychiatrists to safeguard themselves and ensure ethical practice when faced with such dilemmas.

    Related Experiment Videos