Research training in psychiatry

The authors examined data on 13 requests for federal support for psychiatric research investigation that were evaluated as part of the NIMH review of psychiatric education grants in fiscal year 1975. Thirteen factors were found to be associated with quality of psychiatric research training, and the interaction and importance of these factors are illustrated in summaries of 5 programs. The ideal program is described as one in which there is a clearly stated concept, content that is broad and relevant enough to interest trainees in psychiatry, a continuing evaluation process, and superior research that can be documented. Adequate depth and breadth in terms of faculty and facilities are also essential. The authors believe that all psychiatrists should be encouraged to integrate scientific observation into their professional work and to evaluate systematically the effectiveness of their clinical interventions.