Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Research training in psychiatry

H Pardes, A M Freedman, V Reus

    The American Journal of Psychiatry
    |March 1, 1977
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study identified 13 key factors for high-quality psychiatric research training. An ideal program requires clear goals, relevant content, ongoing evaluation, and strong faculty and facilities for effective psychiatric investigation.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Educating psychiatrists for the 1990s.

    Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry·2014
    Same author

    Response.

    The Journal of psychotherapy practice and research·2012
    Same author

    Genome-wide linkage scan of bipolar disorder in a Colombian population isolate replicates Loci on chromosomes 7p21-22, 1p31, 16p12 and 21q21-22 and identifies a novel locus on chromosome 12q.

    Human heredity·2010
    Same author

    Estimation of red blood cell count from hematocrit.

    American journal of clinical pathology·2010
    Same author

    A narrow and highly significant linkage signal for severe bipolar disorder in the chromosome 5q33 region in Latin American pedigrees.

    American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics·2009
    Same author

    The pharmacogenetics research network: from SNP discovery to clinical drug response.

    Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2007
    Same journal

    2026 Annual Meeting: President-Elect Address.

    The American journal of psychiatry·2026
    Same journal

    2026 Annual Meeting: CEO and Medical Director's Address.

    The American journal of psychiatry·2026
    Same journal

    Reports to the Membership.

    The American journal of psychiatry·2026
    Same journal

    Convergent Metabolic Dysregulations But Divergent Contributing Pathways Across Severe Mental Disorders: The Power of Combining Genetics and Metabolomics.

    The American journal of psychiatry·2026
    Same journal

    2026 Annual Meeting: Presidential Address.

    The American journal of psychiatry·2026
    Same journal

    Represcribing Previously Used Antipsychotics: Response to So.

    The American journal of psychiatry·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Psychiatry
    • Medical Education
    • Research Methodology

    Background:

    • Federal support for psychiatric research is crucial for advancing the field.
    • Evaluating the quality of psychiatric research training programs is essential for future scientific endeavors.
    • The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) plays a role in assessing psychiatric education grants.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To identify factors associated with high-quality psychiatric research training.
    • To analyze the characteristics of effective psychiatric research programs.
    • To provide recommendations for improving psychiatric research education.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of 13 federal grant applications for psychiatric research.
    • Evaluation of these applications as part of the NIMH review process in fiscal year 1975.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Summarization of 5 exemplary programs to illustrate key factors.

    • Main Results:

    • Thirteen distinct factors were identified as being associated with the quality of psychiatric research training.
    • Specific program characteristics contributing to ideal training were detailed, including clear concepts and relevant content.
    • The importance of faculty expertise, facilities, and documented superior research was highlighted.

    Conclusions:

    • An ideal psychiatric research training program features a clear concept, broad and relevant content, continuous evaluation, and documented superior research.
    • Adequate faculty and facilities are fundamental for robust training.
    • Psychiatrists should integrate scientific observation and systematically evaluate clinical interventions.