Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Comparing decision bound and exemplar models of categorization

W T Maddox1, F G Ashby

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara 93106.

Perception & Psychophysics
|January 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sex differences in cognitive performance and alcohol consumption in High Alcohol-Drinking (HAD-1) rats.

Behavioural brain research·2020
Same author

Sex-specific ultrasonic vocalization patterns and alcohol consumption in high alcohol-drinking (HAD-1) rats.

Physiology & behavior·2017
Same author

Toward a dual-learning systems model of speech category learning.

Frontiers in psychology·2014
Same author

Neural correlates of rule-based and information-integration visual category learning.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2006
Same author

On the nature of implicit categorization.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2002
Same author

Separating perceptual processes from decisional processes in identification and categorization.

Perception & psychophysics·2002
Same journal

Response organization in selective adaptation to speech sounds.

Perception & psychophysics·2014
Same journal

Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Simple and contingent adaptation effects for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory property detectors and processing place features in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities.

Perception & psychophysics·2008
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Decision bound models offer a superior alternative to exemplar models for predicting categorization performance, especially with complex data and individual subject analysis. These models accurately capture how people learn and categorize information.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Categorization is a fundamental cognitive process.
  • Exemplar models and decision bound models are leading computational approaches to understanding categorization.
  • Existing exemplar models, like the generalized context model, have limitations in explaining complex categorization data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the predictive accuracy of a decision bound model against two exemplar models (generalized context model and a deterministic exemplar model).
  • To evaluate model performance under varying conditions, including normally distributed and non-normally distributed category exemplars, and linear versus non-linear decision bounds.
  • To determine the conditions under which decision bound models offer advantages over exemplar models in explaining categorization performance.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Computational modeling approach comparing different theoretical frameworks.
  • Analysis of categorization data under controlled experimental conditions with varying exemplar distributions and decision bound complexities.
  • Application and evaluation of models on existing empirical datasets (Nosofsky, 1986, 1989).

Main Results:

  • Decision bound and deterministic exemplar models performed comparably when category exemplars were normally distributed and optimal decision bounds were linear.
  • The decision bound model significantly outperformed exemplar models when optimal decision bounds were non-linear.
  • The decision bound model showed superior performance on non-normally distributed categorization data, particularly with single-subject analyses, extensive training, and complex suboptimalities.

Conclusions:

  • The decision bound is a critical factor in predicting asymptotic categorization performance.
  • Decision bound models provide a robust and viable alternative to current exemplar models for explaining human categorization.
  • The findings support the fundamental importance of decision bounds in cognitive categorization theories.