Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Error analysis in manual and automated DNA sequencing

F Khurshid1, S Beck

  • 1Imperial Cancer Research Fund, London.

Analytical Biochemistry
|January 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Kids save lives: Who should train schoolchildren in resuscitation? A systematic review.

Resuscitation plus·2024
Same author

Hyperbilirubinemia screening and treatment in neonates born prior to 35 weeks of gestation.

Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine·2024
Same author

Fate of Quasiparticles at High Temperature in the Correlated Metal Sr_{2}RuO_{4}.

Physical review letters·2023
Same author

Buried graphene heterostructures for electrostatic doping of low-dimensional materials.

Nanotechnology·2023
Same author

Unloader bracing in osteoarthritis of the knee - Is there a direct effect on the damaged cartilage?

The Knee·2022
Same author

Insulin expression in β cells is reduced within islets before islet loss in diabetic cats.

The Journal of small animal practice·2022
Same journal

Lysozyme assay using a rationally designed GN4G2 substrate with coupled β-glucosidase reaction.

Analytical biochemistry·2026
Same journal

The long run: A tribute to Arthur Joseph Lawrence Cooper.

Analytical biochemistry·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of a method for affinity measurement using solution equilibrium titration with magnetic beads.

Analytical biochemistry·2026
Same journal

Metabolomics approach using UHPLC/QE-MS for the mechanism of He Xue Ming Mu tablets on non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

Analytical biochemistry·2026
Same journal

UniRES-GO: Unified residue-level early fusion of sequence and predicted structure for protein function prediction.

Analytical biochemistry·2026
Same journal

IgG detection by enzyme-linked mass spectrometric assay versus color, fluorescent, ECL in buffer and serum.

Analytical biochemistry·2026
See all related articles

Analyzing DNA sequence data errors from manual and automated methods revealed distinct error profiles. These findings offer guidance for assessing sequence data quality across different projects and techniques.

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Bioinformatics
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Accurate DNA sequence data is crucial for biological research.
  • Various methods exist for reading and digitizing sequence data, each with potential for error.
  • Understanding these errors is key to reliable data interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the frequency, position, and type of errors in DNA sequence data.
  • To compare error profiles generated by manual digitizers and automated gel readers.
  • To provide guidance for assessing DNA sequence data quality.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of approximately 400 film/gel readings.
  • Generation of error profiles for three distinct data acquisition methods: manual digitizer, off-line automated film reader, and on-line automated gel reader.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Systematic categorization of errors based on frequency, position, and type.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified method-specific and project-specific problem areas in DNA sequence data generation.
    • Quantified error rates and patterns for manual and automated reading techniques.
    • Demonstrated significant differences in error characteristics between the analyzed methods.

    Conclusions:

    • Error profiles provide valuable insights into the reliability of different DNA sequencing data acquisition methods.
    • The findings offer practical guidance for researchers to anticipate and mitigate errors in their sequence data.
    • Improved assessment of DNA sequence data quality can be achieved through understanding these error profiles.