Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Gestational diabetes: a non-entity?

R J Jarrett1

  • 1United Medical and Dental School, London.

BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)
|January 2, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Screening for gestational diabetes lacks clear definitions and consensus on management. While linked to fetal macrosomia, its role as a screening condition is questionable, failing key criteria for effective population health programs.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The concomitants of raised blood sugar: studies in newly-detected hyperglycaemics: II. Urinary albumin excretion, blood pressure and their relation to blood sugar levels.

International journal of epidemiology·2014
Same author

Commentary: professor Harry Keen, clinician, epidemiologist, diabetologist, basic scientist and defender of the UK National Health Service.

International journal of epidemiology·2014
Same author

The metabolic syndrome.

Lancet (London, England)·2005
Same author

Obesity and overweight in relation to disease-specific mortality in men with and without existing coronary heart disease in London: the original Whitehall study.

Heart (British Cardiac Society)·2005
Same author

Obesity and overweight in relation to organ-specific cancer mortality in London (UK): findings from the original Whitehall study.

International journal of obesity (2005)·2005
Same author

Glycaemia and vascular effects of type 2 diabetes. Relation between diabetes and hyperglycaemia and cardiovascular disease has not been resolved.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2001
Same journal

Peptides: FDA appointed advisory committee criticised for conflicts of interest.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same journal

Hantavirus outbreak linked to cruise ship is over, say officials.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same journal

BMA recommends that 16 and 17 year olds get access to cross sex hormones.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same journal

Andy Burnham could apply lessons from Manchester to create a healthier Britain with a stronger economy.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same journal

Uganda confirms Marburg case as Ebola outbreak continues.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same journal

Australia increases penalties for social media companies to enforce under 16s ban.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Endocrinology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screening is widely recommended.
  • There is a lack of consensus on GDM definition, management, and treatment.
  • Screening is often based on fetal macrosomia, a poorly defined complication.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the history and current status of gestational diabetes screening.
  • To evaluate the suitability of GDM for a screening program.
  • To clarify the definition and implications of GDM and macrosomia.

Main Methods:

  • Historical review of gestational diabetes literature.
  • Analysis of diagnostic criteria and management guidelines.
  • Evaluation against established screening program criteria.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Gestational diabetes lacks a universally agreed-upon definition.
  • Macrosomia, a primary indication for screening, is also ill-defined.
  • GDM is best understood as temporary impaired glucose tolerance during pregnancy.
  • GDM is a significant predictor of future non-insulin-dependent diabetes.

Conclusions:

  • Gestational diabetes does not meet the criteria for a suitable screening program.
  • Current screening practices may be based on unclear definitions and uncertain benefits.
  • The primary importance of GDM may lie in its predictive value for future diabetes risk.