Related Experiment Videos

Who's to choose? Surrogate decisionmaking in New York State

¹Division of Humanities in Medicine, SUNY Health Science Center, Brooklyn.

The Hastings Center Report

|January 1, 1993

Abstract:

The problem of finding appropriate decisionmakers for incapacitated patients continues to beleaguer caregivers. In New York state, a specially appointed task force has recently examined this issue and made some novel recommendations.

Keywords:

Death and Euthanasia Legal Approach New York State Task Force on Life and the Law Professional Patient Relationship When Others Must Choose: Deciding for Patients Without Capacity

Related Concept Videos

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Defining the Profile of People With Emotional Disorders That Drop Out or Do Not Respond to Treatment After Receiving the Unified Protocol in Group Format.

Clinical psychology & psychotherapy·2025

A meta-analytic review of attitudes towards the sexuality of adults with intellectual disabilities as measured by the ASQ-ID and related variables: Is context the key?

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR·2022

Ethical considerations on the complicity of psychologists and scientists in torture.

Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps·2019

Goodbye to all that. The end of moderate protectionism in human subjects research.

The Hastings Center report·2001

US medical researchers, the Nuremberg Doctors Trial, and the Nuremberg Code. A review of findings of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments.

JAMA·1996

Ethical considerations of industry-sponsored research: the use of human subjects.

Journal of the American College of Nutrition·1996

See all related articles