Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Nursing at a crossroads: managing without facts

S M McManus1, J V Pearson

  • 1Department of Health Administration, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton.

Health Care Management Review
|January 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparison of actionable events detected in cancer genomes by whole-genome sequencing, in silico whole-exome and mutation panels.

ESMO open·2022
Same author

Whole-genome sequencing reveals clinically relevant insights into the aetiology of familial breast cancers.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2019
Same author

The value of molecular haplotypes in a family-based linkage study.

American journal of human genetics·2006
Same author

Health care reform: past experiences and current status.

Journal of health and human services administration·1999
Same author

National health care reform failure: the political economy perspective.

Journal of health and human services administration·1999
Same author

Comparative health systems: a conceptual framework.

Journal of health and human services administration·1999

Discrepancies in nursing structures, support systems, and patient classification hinder research. Standardized definitions and methods are needed for reliable comparisons in nursing science.

Area of Science:

  • Nursing Science
  • Healthcare Management

Background:

  • Existing literature on nursing structures, support systems, and patient classification exhibits inconsistencies.
  • Definitions and methodologies vary significantly across studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the lack of systematic research in nursing structural variables.
  • To address the discrepancies in definitions and methods used in nursing research.
  • To underscore the need for standardization to enable valid comparisons.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature review (implied).
  • Analysis of definitions and methodologies in nursing research.
  • Identification of discrepancies and inconsistencies.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Significant discrepancies identified in definitions and methods.
  • Lack of systematic research contributes to uncertainty.
  • Comparisons between studies are currently untenable due to variability.

Conclusions:

  • The current state of research on nursing structures, support systems, and patient classification is fragmented.
  • Standardized definitions and research methodologies are crucial for advancing nursing science.
  • Further systematic research is required to resolve inconsistencies and facilitate evidence-based practice.