Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Risk of cardiological interventions]

M Pfisterer1

  • 1Kardiologische Abteilung, Departement Innere Medizin, Kantonsspital Basel.

Schweizerische Medizinische Wochenschrift
|February 20, 1993
PubMed
Summary

Assessing cardiac intervention risks requires comparing potential benefits against natural disease progression and alternative treatments. Patient factors and intervention type influence the risk-benefit analysis for optimal decision-making.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[More pain assessment in individuals with advanced dementia! : Appropriate treatment is not possible without targeted observation].

Schmerz (Berlin, Germany)·2019
Same author

Prognostic impact of systemic inflammatory diseases in elderly patients with congestive heart failure.

QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians·2013
Same author

Improved two-year outcomes after drug-eluting versus bare-metal stent implantation in women and men with large coronary arteries: importance of vessel size.

International journal of cardiology·2013
Same author

[Palliative care in geriatrics].

Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)·2013
Same author

[Consensus for the identification of geriatric patients in the emergency care setting in Germany].

Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie·2012
Same author

[Palliative care for patients with dementia].

Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie·2012

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Medical Interventions
  • Health Outcomes Research

Context:

  • Cardiac interventions require careful risk-benefit analysis.
  • Complications are influenced by patient demographics, disease severity, and procedural techniques.
  • Natural disease progression serves as a critical benchmark for evaluating interventions.

Purpose:

  • To analyze the multifaceted risks and benefits of cardiac interventions.
  • To differentiate benefit definitions across diagnostic, therapeutic, and prophylactic procedures.
  • To explore factors beyond risk that guide intervention selection.

Summary:

  • Cardiac intervention risk assessment must weigh potential benefits against natural history and alternative treatments.
  • Complications correlate with patient age, disease severity, gender, and technique.
  • Benefit is defined by diagnostic accuracy, symptom relief, quality of life, survival, or life extension, depending on the intervention type.

Impact:

  • Provides a framework for optimizing cardiac intervention strategies.
  • Highlights the importance of personalized medicine in cardiovascular care.
  • Informs clinical practice by considering a holistic view of intervention choice.

Related Experiment Videos