Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 24, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Effects of an ionic versus a nonionic low osmolar contrast agent on the thrombotic complications of coronary
J H Piessens1, F Stammen, M C Vrolix
1Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.
Insights
Ionic contrast agents are safer for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) procedures. Studies show ionic agents like ioxaglate lead to fewer in-laboratory thrombotic events compared to nonionic agents such as iohexol.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Radiology
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Nonionic contrast agents may increase thrombotic complication risk.
- This risk is critical in percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA).
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare thrombotic complications between ionic and nonionic contrast agents during PTCA.
- To determine the preferred contrast agent for PTCA procedures.
Main Methods:
- Prospective randomized trial of 500 patients undergoing PTCA.
- Comparison of low osmolality ionic ioxaglate versus nonionic iohexol.
- Multivariate analysis to identify predictors of rethrombosis.
Main Results:
- Significantly fewer in-laboratory thrombotic events with ioxaglate (8) vs. iohexol (18; P < 0.05).
- No significant difference in out-of-laboratory acute rethrombotic events.
- Nonionic agent use independently predicted in-laboratory rethrombosis.
Conclusions:
- Ionic contrast agents are preferred over nonionic agents for PTCA.
- Ioxaglate demonstrates a favorable safety profile in PTCA compared to iohexol.
- Reducing in-laboratory thrombosis is crucial for PTCA outcomes.
Abstract:
An increasing body of evidence suggests that the potential for thrombotic complications is greater with nonionic than with ionic contrast agents. This is a particularly important consideration in the highly thrombogenic setting of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). To explore this issue further, 500 consecutive patients undergoing PTCA were prospectively randomized to receive the low osmolality ionic ioxaglate or the nonionic agent iohexol. The number of acute thrombotic in-laboratory events was significantly less in the ioxaglate than in the iohexol group (8 versus 18; P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between the 2 groups as regards the number of out-of-laboratory acute rethrombotic events. With multivariate analysis, use of the nonionic agent rather than the ionic agent emerged as an independent predictor of acute in-laboratory rethrombosis. These data suggest that, in the performance of PTCA, an ionic, rather than a nonionic, should be the preferred contrast agent.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Antianginal Drugs: Calcium Channel Blockers and Ranolazine
CCBs, a diverse class that includes dihydropyridines (nifedipine) and diphenylalkylamines (verapamil and diltiazem), exert their effect by blocking calcium channels in cardiac and smooth muscle cells. This...
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care