Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparing internal and external standards in voice quality judgments

B R Gerratt1, J Kreiman, N Antonanzas-Barroso

  • 1VA Medical Center, West Los Angeles, CA.

Journal of Speech and Hearing Research
|February 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Laryngeal transplantation in 2005: a review.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2006
Same author

Measuring vocal quality with speech synthesis.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2002
Same author

Lack of evoked laryngeal electromyography response in patients with a clinical diagnosis of vocal cord paralysis.

The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2001
Same author

Clicking in the throat: cinematic fiction or surgical fact?

Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery·2001
Same author

Combined buccal mucosa island and sternohyoid flaps: a new technique of hemilaryngeal reconstruction studied in a canine model.

The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2001
Same author

Radial forearm free flap pharyngoesophageal reconstruction.

The Laryngoscope·2001
Same journal

Temporal resolution in infancy and subsequent language development.

Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
Same journal

Evidence of sensitivity to structural contrasts in the literature on children's language comprehension.

Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
Same journal

Narrative development in late talkers: early school age.

Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
Same journal

A system for the diagnosis of specific language impairment in kindergarten children.

Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
Same journal

Interactive focused stimulation for toddlers with expressive vocabulary delays.

Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
Same journal

Auditory lexical decisions of children with specific language impairment.

Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
See all related articles

Using explicit anchor stimuli improved voice quality ratings. This method enhanced listener reliability and prevented rating drift compared to traditional scales, benefiting clinical voice assessment.

Area of Science:

  • Speech and Hearing Sciences
  • Acoustic Phonetics
  • Perceptual Voice Evaluation

Background:

  • Voice quality perception relies on listeners comparing stimuli to internal standards.
  • Internal standards for vocal qualities are unstable and susceptible to context effects.
  • This instability can lead to drift in voice ratings over time.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test if explicit, external standards improve listener reliability in voice quality ratings.
  • To investigate whether anchored scales prevent context-induced drift in voice perception.
  • To compare the reliability of anchored versus unanchored rating scales for voice quality.

Main Methods:

  • 12 clinicians rated the roughness of 22 synthetic voice stimuli.
  • Two rating scales were used: a traditional 5-point equal-appearing interval (EAI) scale and an explicitly anchored scale.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Stimuli included normal and mildly rough voices to induce potential drift.

    • Main Results:

    • Ratings using the anchored scale were significantly more reliable than those using the unanchored EAI scale.
    • Ratings on the unanchored EAI scale showed significant drift within the listening session.
    • Ratings on the anchored scale did not exhibit significant drift.

    Conclusions:

    • Explicitly anchored paradigms enhance listener reliability in voice quality evaluation.
    • Anchored scales mitigate context effects and prevent rating drift, unlike traditional EAI scales.
    • This approach offers potential improvements for both voice research and clinical practice.