Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Selecting potential nurses: a review of the methods

L M Land

    Nurse Education Today
    |February 1, 1993
    PubMed
    Summary

    This paper reviews personnel selection methods, highlighting inconsistent grounds for selecting student nurses despite systematic approaches used elsewhere in healthcare management. It questions nursing

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The student nurse selection experience: a qualitative study.

    Journal of advanced nursingยท1994
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Healthcare Management
    • Occupational Psychology
    • Human Resources

    Background:

    • Systematic personnel selection is standard in industry and National Health Service (NHS) management.
    • Nurses represent a significant NHS workforce group, with substantial training costs.
    • Current student nurse selection appears inconsistent and subjective.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To review literature on personnel selection in the context of nurse education.
    • To examine the discrepancy between modern selection practices and those used for student nurses.
    • To question the continued use of subjective selection methods in nursing.

    Main Methods:

    • Literature review of personnel selection strategies.
    • Analysis of occupational psychology and personnel management principles.
    • Comparative analysis of selection methods in general management versus nursing.

    Main Results:

    • Industry and NHS management utilize dynamic, systematic selection methods.
    • Student nurse selection relies on inconsistent and subjective criteria.
    • Significant investment in nurse training is not matched by rigorous selection.

    Conclusions:

    • Nursing education selection methods are outdated and subjective.
    • Systematic personnel selection is crucial for effective workforce development.
    • There is a need to adopt evidence-based selection practices in nursing recruitment.

    Related Experiment Videos