Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Conscientious objection and abortifacient drugs

D B Brushwood1

  • 1University of Florida, Gainesville.

Clinical Therapeutics
|January 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary

Pharmacists’ rights to conscientious objection regarding abortifacient drugs are examined. Legal protections vary, with employment law, conscience clauses, and religious discrimination law offering nuanced safeguards.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

From confrontation to collaboration: collegial accountability and the expanding role of pharmacists in the management of chronic pain.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2001
Same author

Responsive regulation of Internet pharmacy practice.

Annals of health law·2001
Same author

Scope of home care guidelines.

American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists·2001
Same author

Governance of pharmacy, 1902-52.

Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association (Washington, D.C. : 1996)·2001
Same author

Adverse drug reactions in elderly patients: alternative approaches to postmarket surveillance.

Journal of health law·2001
Same author

Governance of pharmacy, 1852-1902.

Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association (Washington, D.C. : 1996)·2000

Area of Science:

  • Law and Ethics
  • Medical Ethics
  • Pharmaceutical Law

Background:

  • The legal landscape surrounding conscientious objection, particularly for pharmacists dispensing abortifacient drugs, is complex.
  • Understanding the interplay between professional duties and personal beliefs is crucial in healthcare settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the legal right to conscientious objection for pharmacists concerning abortifacient drugs.
  • To analyze the legal protections afforded by employment law, conscience clauses, and religious discrimination law.

Main Methods:

  • Review of legal frameworks including employment law, conscience clauses, and religious discrimination law.
  • Analysis of recent case law relevant to conscientious refusal in pharmacy practice.
Keywords:
Bioethics and Professional EthicsGenetics and ReproductionLegal ApproachAnti-abortion GroupsBiologyCritiqueDelivery Of Health CareEndocrine SystemEthicsHealthHealth PersonnelHormone AntagonistsHormonesInterest GroupsJurisprudencePharmacistsPhysiologyPolitical FactorsRu-486--religious aspects

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Employment law balances public policy with business operations, not individual employee policies.
  • Conscience clauses may protect pharmacists, but require clarification of key terms.
  • Religious discrimination laws mandate accommodation unless it poses an unreasonable burden.

Conclusions:

  • Legal protections for pharmacists asserting conscientious objections are not absolute.
  • Further legal definition is needed for conscience clauses to ensure clarity.
  • The extent of protection hinges on the reasonableness of accommodation for employers.