Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Diagnostic tests--use and interpretation]

A Asberg1

  • 1Sentrallaboratoriet, Innherred sykehus, Levanger.

Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening : Tidsskrift for Praktisk Medicin, Ny Raekke
|February 20, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in patients 1-45 years treated with the pediatric NOPHO ALL2008 protocol.

Leukemia·2019
Same author

The EKiTE network (epidemiology in kidney transplantation - a European validated database): an initiative epidemiological and translational European collaborative research.

BMC nephrology·2019
Same author

Contraceptive Choices and Counseling in Norwegian Female Renal Transplant Recipients.

Transplantation proceedings·2019
Same author

Results of NOPHO ALL2008 treatment for patients aged 1-45 years with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Leukemia·2017
Same author

Outcomes in Pancreas Transplantation With Exocrine Drainage Through a Duodenoduodenostomy Versus Duodenojejunostomy.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2017
Same author

Costimulation Blockade: America First, Canada Second … What About Norway?

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2017
Same journal

Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke·2026
Same journal

Correction: Management of acute epistaxis.

Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke·2026
Same journal

A woman in her 70s with chest pain and elevated troponin T levels.

Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke·2026
Same journal

More systematic follow-up after childbirth.

Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke·2026
Same journal

Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke·2026
Same journal

Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke·2026
See all related articles

Interpreting diagnostic tests accurately is crucial. This review covers methods for quantitative and qualitative tests, optimizing test combinations, and determining optimal testing times to avoid information loss.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Diagnostics
  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Interpretation

Context:

  • Diagnostic tests are essential in clinical decision-making.
  • Misinterpretation of diagnostic test results can lead to suboptimal patient care.
  • Existing methods often fail to adequately address the nuances of quantitative tests.

Purpose:

  • To review and present optimal methods for interpreting diagnostic tests.
  • To address the information loss associated with applying binary test methods to quantitative data.
  • To guide the selection of the best test combinations and determine appropriate testing intervals.

Summary:

  • The review details techniques for the accurate interpretation of both qualitative and quantitative diagnostic tests.
  • It highlights the limitations of binary test interpretation methods when applied to continuous data.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Strategies for combining multiple tests and establishing optimal testing protocols are discussed.

    • Impact:

    • Improved accuracy in diagnostic test interpretation.
    • Enhanced clinical decision-making through better use of quantitative test data.
    • Reduction in information loss and potential for more precise patient management.