Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Developmental toxicity risk assessment: a rough sets approach

R R Hashemi1, F R Jelovsek, M Razzaghi

  • 1Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Arkansas, Little Rock.

Methods of Information in Medicine
|February 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

CNT and rGO reinforced PMMA based bone cement for fixation of load bearing implants: Mechanical property and biological response.

Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials·2021
Same author

Solution of the nonlinear mixed Volterra-Fredholm integral equations by hybrid of block-pulse functions and Bernoulli polynomials.

TheScientificWorldJournal·2014
Same author

Risk assessment for quantitative responses using a mixture model.

Biometrics·2000
Same author

On the correlation coefficient between the TD50 and the MTD.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·1996
Same author

Teaching basic surgical skills in Ob-Gyn.

Obstetrical & gynecological survey·1995
Same author

Reproducibility of the dose-response curve of steroid-induced cleft palate in mice.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·1994
Same journal

Design and methodological development of a digital clinical safety training programme informed by a national framework: a New Zealand case study.

Methods of information in medicine·2026
Same journal

Panic Prediction from Digital Phenotyping: Subject-Level Cross-Validation Reveals Limited Between-Person Generalization.

Methods of information in medicine·2026
Same journal

Agent-Based Modeling Approach for Population Dynamics of the Biological Vector Aedes Aegypti.

Methods of information in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Statistical Framework for Person-centered Analysis of Digital Service Use in Public Health and Social Care.

Methods of information in medicine·2026
Same journal

Assessing the Quality of Electronic Discharge Summaries: A Cross-Sectional Study Using the Validated Spanish Version of the PDQI-9.

Methods of information in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Knowledge Graph-Driven Hypergeometric Efficacy Prediction Model for Classical Traditional Chinese Herbal Formulas.

Methods of information in medicine·2026
See all related articles

A modified rough-sets approach accurately predicts developmental toxicity by analyzing animal study data and compound characteristics, outperforming traditional methods in classification and predictive values.

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Computational Biology
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Predicting developmental toxicity is crucial for human health and drug safety.
  • Existing methods for toxicity prediction have limitations in accuracy and interpretability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate a modified rough-sets approach for predicting human developmental toxicity.
  • To compare the performance of the modified rough-sets approach against the original rough-sets methodology and discriminant analysis.

Main Methods:

  • A rough-sets approach was applied to a dataset of animal study results and compound characteristics.
  • A modified rough-sets approach was developed to generate approximate rules for prediction.
  • The modified rough-sets approach and discriminant analysis were compared using a resampled test dataset.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The modified rough-sets approach demonstrated superior predictability compared to the original rough-sets methodology.
  • Modified rough sets showed better overall classification, sensitivity, and predictive values than discriminant analysis.
  • The findings were validated on a separate test dataset.

Conclusions:

  • The modified rough-sets approach offers a promising and more accurate method for predicting developmental toxicity.
  • This approach provides a valuable tool for risk assessment in drug development and chemical safety.
  • The interpretability of the generated rules enhances understanding of toxicity mechanisms.