Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cost-effectiveness in nuclear medicine

D D Patton1

  • 1Division of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center, Tucson, AZ 85724.

Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
|January 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The father of nuclear medicine: establishing paternity.

Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine·2000
Same author

The barium enigma.

Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine·1999
Same author

How cesium-137 was discovered by an undergraduate student.

Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine·1999
Same author

How technetium was discovered in a pile of junk.

Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine·1998
Same author

Office procedures. Nasopharyngoscopy.

Primary care·1997
Same author

Preoperative detection of sporadic parathyroid adenomas using technetium-99m-sestamibi: what role in clinical practice?

The American surgeon·1997
Same journal

Cost-effectiveness of imaging modalities in coronary heart disease: A comprehensive review.

Seminars in nuclear medicine·2026
Same journal

Letter from the Editors.

Seminars in nuclear medicine·2026
Same journal

Expanding Horizons: The Role of Kaleidoscope and Relevant Images in Seminars in Nuclear Medicine.

Seminars in nuclear medicine·2026
Same journal

The diagnostic performance and clinical value of [18F]FDG PET/CT in pleural mesothelioma - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Seminars in nuclear medicine·2026
Same journal

Feasibility of treating neuroendocrine prostate cancer with anti-SSTR radioligands: A systematic review of imaging and treatment studies.

Seminars in nuclear medicine·2026
Same journal

<sup>18</sup>F-FDG -PET/CT in cardiac sarcoidosis: Diagnosis, therapy monitoring, and future directions.

Seminars in nuclear medicine·2026
See all related articles

Nuclear medicine procedures must be cost-effective, balancing benefits like accurate diagnosis against costs such as radiation dose. Developing standardized performance measures is crucial for assessing diagnostic efficacy and optimizing patient care.

Area of Science:

  • Nuclear Medicine
  • Health Economics
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Nuclear medicine physicians face pressure to reduce costs while maximizing diagnostic and therapeutic efficacy.
  • Cost-effectiveness in healthcare requires balancing procedure benefits against associated costs, including financial, time, and radiation exposure.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the concept of cost-effectiveness in nuclear medicine procedures.
  • To review measures of diagnostic efficacy (efficacy-D), management efficacy (efficacy-M), and outcome efficacy (efficacy-O).
  • To discuss the costs associated with nuclear medicine and the role of decision analysis in cost-effectiveness assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on cost-effectiveness in nuclear medicine.
  • Discussion of diagnostic test performance measures for various tasks (detection, classification, localization, quantitation).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Exploration of decision trees as a tool for cost-effectiveness analysis.

    • Main Results:

    • Diagnostic efficacy measures are well-developed for detection tasks but less so for classification, localization, and quantitation.
    • Costs include financial, time, patient discomfort, drug reactions, and radiation dose, with public perception of radiation risks often exceeding scientific justification.
    • Decision trees can systematically evaluate strategies, outcomes, costs, and benefits.

    Conclusions:

    • Standardized methods for assessing cost-effectiveness in nuclear medicine are needed.
    • Further research is required to develop consistent procedures for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of nuclear medicine interventions.
    • Accurate assessment of diagnostic efficacy and patient management is key to cost-effective nuclear medicine.