Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

Clinical Application of Microscope-Assisted Minimally Invasive Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Published on: June 16, 2023
Appropriateness of antibiotic selection and use in laminectomy and microdiskectomy
1Department of Pharmacy, Albert B. Chandler Medical Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40536.
Abstract:
The selection and timing of antibiotic prophylaxis in spinal surgery patients were studied. All laminectomy and microdiskectomy cases in which surgical-wound infection had developed within 60 days of surgery during 1990 at a medical center were retrospectively reviewed because of the high rate of postoperative wound infection for these procedures at the institution. The evaluation covered drug selection, the timing of antibiotic administration relative to the surgical incision, culture and susceptibility test results, and the length of the surgical procedure. Surgical-wound infection was found to have developed in 22 (7%) of the 315 patients who underwent laminectomy or microdiskectomy. There was no apparent difference between the infected group and a matched, uninfected control group in either the antibiotic selected or the number of doses given. On the basis of the organisms isolated from the wounds and susceptibility test results, the selection of cefazolin as the antibiotic was appropriate in 17 of the 22 infected patients. However, compared with the control group, the infected group had a significantly higher percentage of patients in whom antibiotics had been given more than two hours before the time of the surgical incision. The policy on administering prophylactic antibiotics was modified; current guidelines include giving the first dose of cefazolin upon the induction of anesthesia and follow-up administration in three hours if the incision has not been closed by then. The selection of a prophylactic antibiotic for spinal surgery patients was appropriate, but the timing of drug administration was usually not optimal.
Insights
Optimal antibiotic timing is crucial for preventing surgical-wound infections in spinal surgery. This study found cefazolin selection appropriate, but administration timing significantly impacted infection rates, leading to revised protocols.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Neurosurgery
- Clinical Pharmacy
Background:
- Spinal surgery, including laminectomy and microdiskectomy, has a notable rate of postoperative wound infections.
- Understanding factors influencing these infections is critical for patient safety and improved surgical outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in spinal surgery.
- To determine if antibiotic selection and timing influence surgical-wound infection rates.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 315 laminectomy and microdiskectomy cases from 1990.
- Analysis of antibiotic selection, timing of administration, culture results, and procedure length.
- Comparison between infected and uninfected patient groups.
Main Results:
- Surgical-wound infection occurred in 7% of patients.
- Antibiotic selection (cefazolin) was appropriate in most cases.
- A significant association was found between infection and antibiotic administration more than two hours before incision.
Conclusions:
- While cefazolin selection was appropriate, the timing of prophylactic antibiotic administration in spinal surgery was often suboptimal.
- Revised guidelines emphasize timely administration upon anesthesia induction and re-dosing if needed.
- Optimizing antibiotic prophylaxis timing can reduce surgical-wound infection rates.
Related Concept Videos
Antibiotic Selection
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
