Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Signal processing and display--cardiotocographs

M C Carter1

  • 1Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital Medical School, London, UK.

British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
|March 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Identification of alpha-gal sensitivity in patients with a diagnosis of idiopathic anaphylaxis.

Allergy·2017
Same author

Plant structure and the searching efficiency of coccinellid larvae.

Oecologia·2017
Same author

Development and validation of the mastocytosis quality of life questionnaire: MC-QoL.

Allergy·2016
Same author

A reliable sign for the diagnosis of fractures of the hip and pelvis.

Orthopedics·2014
Same author

Letters to the editor.

Orthopedics·2014
Same author

Management of colorectal cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Techniques in coloproctology·2013
Same journal

Livial: an economic appraisal.

British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2000
Same journal

Livial: a review of clinical studies.

British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2000
Same journal

Place of birth and shoulder dystocia.

British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·1999
Same journal

The value of the negative predictive values.

British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·1999
Same journal

Splenectomy during pregnancy: an option in treatment of autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura.

British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·1999
Same journal

Third trimester abortion: is compassion enough?

British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·1999
See all related articles

Current cardiotocographs have limited data resolution, hindering accurate fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring. These devices cannot capture beat-to-beat FHR changes, impacting detailed fetal well-being assessment.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Obstetrics
  • Signal Processing

Background:

  • Cardiotocographs (CTGs) are standard tools for fetal monitoring during pregnancy and labor.
  • Existing CTG technology possesses inherent limitations in data resolution and accuracy.
  • These limitations affect the precise assessment of fetal well-being.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the technological limitations of current cardiotocographs.
  • To identify sources of error in data collection, signal processing, and FHR printing.
  • To evaluate the capability of CTGs in capturing beat-to-beat fetal heart rate variability.

Main Methods:

  • Review of cardiotocograph technology and data processing algorithms.
  • Analysis of signal processing techniques, specifically autocorrelation, used in FHR detection.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of data output and printing limitations.

    • Main Results:

    • The fundamental resolution of recorded data in cardiotocographs is constrained by the technology used.
    • Errors arise during data collection, autocorrelation-based signal processing, and FHR printing.
    • While capable of showing baseline variability, CTGs cannot display beat-to-beat changes in FHR.

    Conclusions:

    • Current cardiotocograph technology is inadequate for capturing beat-to-beat fetal heart rate changes.
    • The limitations impact the detailed assessment of fetal heart rate dynamics.
    • Further technological advancements are needed to improve the resolution and accuracy of fetal monitoring devices.