Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Litigation and the cardiotocogram

E M Symonds1

  • 1Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University Hospital, Nottingham, UK.

British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
|March 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pepper mild mottle virus: A plant pathogen with a greater purpose in (waste)water treatment development and public health management.

Water research·2018
Same author

Microbial source tracking in shellfish harvesting waters in the Gulf of Nicoya, Costa Rica.

Water research·2017
Same author

Faecal pollution along the southeastern coast of Florida and insight into the use of pepper mild mottle virus as an indicator.

Journal of applied microbiology·2016
Same author

Reduction of nutrients, microbes, and personal care products in domestic wastewater by a benchtop electrocoagulation unit.

Scientific reports·2015
Same author

A case study of enteric virus removal and insights into the associated risk of water reuse for two wastewater treatment pond systems in Bolivia.

Water research·2014
Same author

Audit of birth defects in 34,109 deliveries in a tertiary referral center.

The Medical journal of Malaysia·2006

Obstetric litigation highlights inconsistent cardiotocography (CTG) standards. Defining abnormal CTG, monitoring duration, equipment issues, and archiving are crucial for legal and clinical practice.

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Medical Law
  • Clinical Practice Standards

Background:

  • Obstetric litigation frequently arises from disputes over fetal monitoring during labor.
  • Cardiotocography (CTG) is a key tool, but its interpretation and application lack standardized guidelines.
  • Disagreements among experts underscore the need for clearer protocols in obstetric care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the factors contributing to liability in obstetric litigation related to cardiotocography.
  • To identify and discuss the challenges in defining abnormal cardiotocogram (CTG) findings.
  • To examine the implications of equipment quality and decisions not to monitor on patient outcomes and legal defensibility.

Main Methods:

  • Review of expert arguments and case law in obstetric litigation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of current practices and guidelines concerning cardiotocography interpretation.
  • Discussion of technical and clinical factors influencing CTG monitoring.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant lack of consensus exists among experts regarding the definition and significance of abnormal cardiotocograms (CTGs).
    • Inadequate equipment and the decision to forgo monitoring are identified as potential contributors to adverse outcomes and legal challenges.
    • A minimum record archiving period of 25 years is suggested for medico-legal purposes.

    Conclusions:

    • Standardization of cardiotocography interpretation and practice is urgently needed to reduce obstetric litigation.
    • Clearer guidelines are required for defining abnormal CTG patterns, duration thresholds, and equipment standards.
    • Robust record-keeping and archiving policies are essential for medico-legal defense in obstetric cases.