[Standard formulas of parenteral nutrition. A study of their use in a general hospital]

The goal of the study was to evaluate the use of parenteral nutrition formulas with standardized g. of nitrogen, carbohydrates and lipids, and to analyze whether the nutritional requirements of the patients treated in our hospital were covered by said formulas or whether it was necessary to change and/or standardize a new formula. To do so, a review was made of 5.646 parental nutrition mixtures prepared in the Pharmacy Service and patterned by the Nutrition Service from April, 1991, to May, 1992, for 308 adult patients. The distribution of the mixtures by services, diagnoses and the frequency of the different standard formulas were studied, comparing standard formula frequency with that of non-standard formulas. Findings showed that 41.9% of nutrition mixtures were patterned in surgery, and the most common diagnosis, cancer, appeared in 24%. Of the mixtures, 67.6% were preestablished formulas, and 32.4% were non-standard formulas. The order of frequency among standard formulas was: basic standard formulas, stress formulas, initial formulas, peripheral formulas, hemodialysis formulas and low-volume formulas. All covered the nutritional needs of a large share of the patients for the different pathologies in which they were indicated. Nevertheless the question of designing a new formula to cover a greater number of situations was raised. Protocolization should take place rationally, to meet the hospital's most frequent pathologies, and effectiveness should be evaluated after tracking and checking each patient.