Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Does the "missed" radiographic diagnosis constitute malpractice?

L Berlin

    Radiology
    |May 1, 1977
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Considerations About A Case Of Azomic Lung.

    Anales de la Catedra de Patologia y Clinica de la Tuberculosis·2010
    Same author

    Isolated autonomic phenomena in conversion neurosis.

    Diseases of the nervous system·2010
    Same author

    Isolated autonomic phenomena in conversion neurosis.

    University Hospital bulletin·2010
    Same author

    Sustained performance and regulation of effort in clinical and non-clinical hyperactive children.

    Child: care, health and development·2003
    Same author

    Physician assistants.

    AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2001
    Same author

    Statute of limitations and the continuum of care doctrine.

    AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2001
    Same journal

    Erratum for: Prediction of Lobar Emphysema Progression with a CT-Based Foundational Model.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Erratum for: Associations of MRI-derived Paraspinal IMAT and LMM with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: Results from a German Cohort.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Erratum for: Blue Rubber Bleb Nevus Syndrome.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Redefining the Clinical Role of MRI in Endometrial Cancer Staging.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    To Ablate or Not to Ablate: The Colorectal Liver Metastasis Question.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    The Limits of Radiologic Categorization in Pulmonary Nonsolid Nodules.

    Radiology·2026
    See all related articles

    Radiologists frequently disagree, leading to missed pathological findings. Developing a standard of radiological practice is crucial for distinguishing negligence from simple errors in legal and medical contexts.

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Imaging
    • Radiology
    • Legal Medicine

    Background:

    • Radiologists exhibit significant inter-observer variability, with disagreement rates up to 50%.
    • A substantial percentage of pathological findings (up to 30%) are missed during radiological interpretation.
    • Current legal frameworks lack clear distinctions between "simple" errors and "negligent" errors in radiology.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To address the challenge of distinguishing between simple and negligent errors in radiology.
    • To propose the development of a "standard of radiological practice" to aid legal and medical professionals.
    • To advocate for the establishment of review panels for assessing adherence to radiological standards.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of existing studies on radiologist disagreement and missed findings.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Legal and medical literature review concerning malpractice and error classification.
  • Proposal for the creation of practical guidelines and review mechanisms.

    • Main Results:

    • High rates of disagreement and missed findings highlight a need for standardized practices.
    • The absence of practical guidelines complicates the legal determination of negligence in radiological errors.
    • The development of a standard of practice is essential for objective evaluation.

    Conclusions:

    • A "standard of radiological practice" is necessary to differentiate between simple errors and negligence.
    • Radiological societies should lead the development of these standards.
    • Review panels can provide objective medical opinions on adherence to practice standards.