Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Auditory and visual localization performance in a sequential discrimination task

D R Perrott1, B Costantino, J Cisneros

  • 1Psychoacoustics Laboratory, California State University, Los Angeles 90032.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|April 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Recommendations for the prevention of healthcare-associated infections in nursing homes].

Farmaceuticos comunitarios·2024
Same author

The effect of obesity and tobacco smoke exposure on inflammatory mediators and matrix metalloproteinases in rat model.

Toxicology mechanisms and methods·2014
Same author

Oncological outcomes of nephron sparing nephrectomy. 17-year analysis.

Archivos espanoles de urologia·2014
Same author

Oxidative stress and lung injury induced by short-term exposure to wood smoke in guinea pigs.

Toxicology mechanisms and methods·2013
Same author

Renin is an angiotensin-independent profibrotic mediator: role in pulmonary fibrosis.

The European respiratory journal·2011
Same author

Emamectin benzoate (Affirm). a modern insecticide for the control of lepidoptera larvae on fruits, grapes and vegetables crops.

Communications in agricultural and applied biological sciences·2011
Same journal

High-resolution depth estimation for multiple wideband sources in deep sea via sparse Bayesian learninga).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Depression markers in speech: An approach based on tract variables dynamics.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The oyster toadfish (Opsanus tau) alters active and diurnal calling amid vessel noise in New York City.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Experimental noise characterisation of phase-locked tandem-rotor in edgewise flight.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The tune-text-temporal synergy: Prosodic effects of final segmental weakening in Neapolitan.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Monitoring vessel movement above critical offshore infrastructure using distributed acoustic sensing.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
See all related articles

This study compared auditory and visual spatial localization. Auditory localization (minimum audible angle) generally outperformed visual localization (minimum visible angle) in the frontal field.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory and Visual Perception
  • Spatial Localization
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Accurate spatial localization is crucial for human interaction with the environment.
  • Understanding the differences between auditory and visual spatial perception aids in designing multisensory systems.
  • Previous research has explored auditory and visual localization independently.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To directly compare spatial localization abilities using auditory and visual stimuli.
  • To determine if auditory spatial acuity exceeds visual spatial acuity in the frontal visual field.
  • To investigate the influence of stimulus presentation location on relative performance.

Main Methods:

  • Employed a two-alternative, forced-choice adaptive paradigm with four human subjects.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Presented two 200-ms signals sequentially with a 200-ms interstimulus interval.
  • Tested minimum audible angle (MAA) using 1.0-kHz high-pass noise and minimum visible angle (MVA) using 620 nm red light.

    • Main Results:

    • Localization performance in the MAA task was generally equal to or better than the MVA task across the frontal field.
    • An exception was observed at 0 degrees azimuth, where performance differences were noted.
    • Subjects indicated whether the second stimulus was to the right or left of the first.

    Conclusions:

    • Auditory spatial localization demonstrates superior or comparable performance to visual localization in most frontal field regions.
    • The findings suggest potential advantages for auditory cues in certain spatial awareness applications.
    • Further research is needed to explore the nuances of spatial localization at specific azimuthal angles.