Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Randomized controlled comparison of antitachycardia pacing algorithms for termination of ventricular tachycardia
1Division of Cardiology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Objectives:
This study compared the efficacy and safety of two antitachycardia pacing algorithms in the treatment of ventricular tachycardia.
Background:
There is agreement that antitachycardia pacing should be adapted to tachycardia rate and be delivered in a burst, but the ideal pacing pattern is not well understood. Effective antitachycardia pacing burst patterns include those with a between-burst decrement (SCAN) with or without an additional within-burst decrement (RAMP).
Methods:
Prospective randomized crossover comparison of two antitachycardia pacing algorithms (RAMP vs. SCAN) on identical induced sustained ventricular tachycardias was performed.
Results:
Sixty-five ventricular tachycardias (mean cycle length 364 +/- 74 ms) from 37 invasive studies performed in 29 patients were studied; 86% of patients had coronary artery disease and 72% were receiving antiarrhythmic therapy at the time of study. Of the 65 tachycardias, 40 were identical pairs and 25 were unpaired (including 8 with a > 30-ms difference in cycle length of induced ventricular tachycardia pairs). In the paired pacing trials, conversion to sinus rhythm occurred, respectively, in 85% of SCAN versus 90% of RAMP protocols (p = 0.63, power = 93%) and within 1.4 +/- 0.7 versus 1.7 +/- 1.1 attempts (p = 0.41). Discordance for pacing success was seen in three pairs. In unpaired trials, conversion to sinus rhythm occurred in 73% and 57%, respectively (p = 0.68, power = 88%). Tachycardia acceleration during pacing occurred in 7 (11%) of 65 attempts (5 SCAN, 2 RAMP). Acceleration in unpaired ventricular tachycardia trials was correlated with tachycardia cycle length. Failure to convert ventricular tachycardia was associated with a shorter tachycardia cycle length (p < 0.05).
Conclusions:
In the patients studied, adaptive antitachycardia pacing was safe and effective and, when successful, occurred within three attempts of an 8-beat adaptive burst algorithm. Changes in burst pattern did not affect pacing safety or efficacy. Antitachycardia pacing success was dependent on induced ventricular tachycardia cycle length.
More Related Videos
06:57Ablation of Ischemic Ventricular Tachycardia Using a Multipolar Catheter and 3-dimensional Mapping System for High-density Electro-anatomical Reconstruction
Published on: January 31, 2019
08:05Optimization of Transesophageal Atrial Pacing to Assess Atrial Fibrillation Susceptibility in Mice
Published on: June 29, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias