Related Experiment Videos

L-proline loading for the assessment of pituitary GH reserve

Endocrinologie
|January 1, 1977
PubMed

Insights

Oral 1-proline and intravenous insulin tolerance tests assessed growth hormone (GH) axis function in children. Insulin induced a higher peak GH response than 1-proline, with limited diagnostic utility for proline in short stature.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Endocrinology
  • Growth Hormone Physiology
  • Metabolic Testing

Background:

  • Assessing the growth hormone (GH) axis is crucial for diagnosing short stature in children.
  • Standard diagnostic tests for GH deficiency or responsiveness can be invasive or have limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of oral 1-proline loading versus intravenous insulin tolerance testing in evaluating GH axis function.
  • To determine if serum 1-proline levels enhance the diagnostic accuracy of the 1-proline load test.

Main Methods:

  • Intravenous insulin tolerance test (0.1 U/kg) and oral 1-proline tolerance test (100 mg/kg) were administered to healthy children and those with short stature.
  • Blood glucose, serum immunoreactive growth hormone (GH), immunoreactive insulin (IRI), and serum 1-proline were measured.

Main Results:

  • Peak serum GH levels were significantly higher after insulin administration compared to 1-proline.
  • The 1-proline load test correctly identified normal GH axis function in 12/22 controls and 3/7 short-statured patients.
  • Incorporating serum 1-proline levels did not substantially improve the test's ability to detect normal GH responsiveness or pituitary insufficiency.

Conclusions:

  • Intravenous insulin tolerance test appears to elicit a stronger GH response than oral 1-proline in pediatric subjects.
  • Oral 1-proline loading has limited diagnostic value for assessing GH axis normality or pituitary insufficiency in short-statured children.
  • The mechanism underlying GH stimulation by 1-proline in some individuals remains unclear.

Related Concept Videos