Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Is a perceived shape based on its retinal image?

I Rock1, C M Linnett

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley 94720.

Perception
|January 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

On the nature and order of organizational processing: A reply to Peterson.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Location and attention.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2001
Same author

Inattentional blindness as a function of proximity to the focus of attention.

Perception·1999
Same author

A belongingness principle of motion perception.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·1997
Same author

Retinal vs. environmental orientation in the perception of the right angle.

Acta psychologica·1995
Same journal

Benchmarking spatial discrimination thresholds of two-frame motion defined forms compared to luminance and stereoscopic defined forms.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The effect of face masks on the perception of trustworthiness and competence in individuals with autistic traits.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The importance of external features for categorizing ethnicity: can Koreans identify Korean, Japanese, and Chinese faces?

Perception·2026
Same journal

Interoception, alexithymia, and motor congruency: Psychological drivers of body ownership in virtual reality.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The frustration of a small <i>n</i>.

Perception·2026
Same journal

Why do we have two eyes.

Perception·2026
See all related articles

Shape perception relies on the perceived locations of an object's parts, not just the retinal image. This study investigated how eye movements and reference frames influence shape constancy and object recognition.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Shape perception is crucial for object recognition and understanding the environment.
  • Traditionally, shape processing is thought to originate from the retinal image, but location-based processing is also considered.
  • Existing research often confounds retinal image information with perceived object location.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To disentangle the contributions of retinal image shape versus perceived object location in shape perception.
  • To investigate the role of eye position constancy mechanisms in shape perception.
  • To determine whether shape constancy is based on the visual input or spatial awareness.

Main Methods:

  • Sequential presentation of shape parts during eye movement to alter the composite retinal image.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Manipulating the perceived location of sequentially presented shape parts using a displacing frame of reference.
  • Comparing perceived composite shape under conditions that vary retinal image fidelity while maintaining perceived spatial relationships.

    • Main Results:

    • Eye movements altered the composite retinal image but did not change the perceived relative locations of shape parts.
    • Changing the location of parts relative to a reference frame also affected perceived shape.
    • The perceived composite shape was primarily determined by the perceived spatial arrangement of the parts, not the retinal image.

    Conclusions:

    • Shape perception is predominantly based on the perceived locations of an object's parts relative to each other.
    • The brain utilizes perceived spatial information, incorporating eye position constancy, for robust shape recognition.
    • This challenges models solely reliant on the fidelity of the retinal image for shape processing.