Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 3, 2026

Murine Endoscopy for In Vivo Multimodal Imaging of Carcinogenesis and Assessment of Intestinal Wound Healing and Inflammation
Published on: August 26, 2014
[Computer systems in gastroenterologic endoscopy. An analysis of current availability on the Austrian market]
14. Medizinische Abteilung, Wilhelminenspital der Stadt Wien.
This study compares five computerized documentation systems for gastrointestinal endoscopy, finding all meet basic requirements but none stand out. It aids in selecting the best computer-aided documentation system.
Area of Science:
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
- Medical Informatics
- Health IT
Background:
- Computerized documentation systems are crucial for managing data in gastrointestinal endoscopy.
- Selecting the appropriate system requires a comprehensive evaluation of various functionalities.
- Existing systems offer diverse features impacting efficiency and data management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare five specific computerized documentation systems for gastrointestinal endoscopy.
- To evaluate system functions including configuration, software, communication, user guidance, data management, and reporting.
- To provide guidance for healthcare professionals in choosing a suitable computer-aided system.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of five systems: ADAM-Fujinon, ENDOBASE-Olympus, MEDASYS-Pentax, MEPAS-Fritsch & Jirak, and OPTAMED-Krötlinger.
- Evaluation criteria included system configuration, software, communication, user guidance, data protection, backup, patient registration, examination preparation, terminology, report generation, image filing, statistics, adjustments, and costs.
- A scoring method was employed to aid in system selection.
Main Results:
- All five systems successfully met the fundamental requirements for computer-aided documentation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: database management, image filing, and report generation.
- No single system demonstrated superiority over the others across all evaluated functions.
- Each system exhibited unique strengths and weaknesses that were individually discussed.
Conclusions:
- The choice of a computerized documentation system in gastrointestinal endoscopy depends on specific institutional needs and priorities.
- A thorough understanding of each system's peculiarities, strengths, and weaknesses is essential for informed decision-making.
- The presented scoring method offers a structured approach to selecting the most appropriate system.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and solid...
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy
Endoscopic Procedures III: Video Capsule Endoscopy
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP
Patient...

