Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Complications in head and neck microsurgery

M M al Qattan1, J B Boyd

  • 1Division of Plastic Surgery, Toronto Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Microsurgery
|January 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A loss of FUS/TLS function leads to impaired cellular proliferation.

Cell death & disease·2014
Same author

The unstable posterior heel scar: Reconstruction using the reverse sural artery adipofascial flap.

Annals of plastic surgery·2007
Same author

Angular nerve: new insights on innervation of the corrugator supercilii and procerus muscles.

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2006
Same author

On the emerging evidence of a new category of duplication in the human hand: the dorsoventral duplication.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2004
Same author

Irreducible tuft fractures of the distal phalanx.

Journal of hand surgery (Edinburgh, Scotland)·2003
Same author

Repair of a large septal perforation with a radial forearm free flap: brief report of a case.

Ear, nose, & throat journal·2001
Same journal

Superficial Palmar Branch of the Radial Artery, Medial Plantar Artery Perforator, and Medial Sural Artery Perforator Free Flaps in Digital Soft Tissue Reconstruction: Comparisons of Clinical Outcomes From a Retrospective Institutional Series.

Microsurgery·2026
Same journal

Lymphovenous Anastomosis for Treatment of Breast Lymphedema Following Delayed Autologous Reconstruction: A Case Report.

Microsurgery·2026
Same journal

Symani-Assisted Microsurgery in Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Indications, Techniques, and Pooled Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.

Microsurgery·2026
Same journal

Proposing Objective 3D Facial Surface Scanning to Evaluate Surgical Outcomes in Facial Lymphedema.

Microsurgery·2026
Same journal

Closure of Tracheoesophageal Fistula Employing the Superficial Circumflex Iliac Artery Perforator (SCIP) Flap: Report of Three Cases.

Microsurgery·2026
Same journal

Umbilical Inset Incision Type Influences Abdominal Donor Site Healing in Autologous Breast Reconstruction.

Microsurgery·2026
See all related articles

Microvascular surgery is crucial for head and neck reconstruction. This study details common complications, including general issues, blood vessel connection problems, and site-specific challenges.

Area of Science:

  • Reconstructive surgery
  • Microsurgery
  • Head and neck oncology

Background:

  • Microvascular surgery is a cornerstone of modern head and neck reconstruction.
  • Complications can significantly impact patient outcomes and treatment success.
  • Understanding these complications is essential for improving surgical techniques and patient care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comprehensively review and classify complications associated with microvascular surgery in head and neck reconstruction.
  • To provide a framework for identifying and managing potential surgical issues.
  • To enhance the safety and efficacy of reconstructive procedures in this complex anatomical region.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of complications in head and neck microvascular reconstructive surgery.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Classification of complications into general, anastomotic, and site-specific categories.
  • Analysis of reported incidence, risk factors, and management strategies for each complication type.

    • Main Results:

    • General complications include infection, flap necrosis, and donor site morbidity.
    • Anastomotic problems encompass thrombosis, stenosis, and dehiscence.
    • Site-specific complications vary based on the chosen flap and recipient area, requiring tailored management.

    Conclusions:

    • Effective management of head and neck microvascular surgery complications requires a thorough understanding of potential issues.
    • Early recognition and prompt intervention are key to minimizing adverse outcomes.
    • Continued research and standardized reporting are needed to further refine surgical practices and improve patient results.