Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

What's lost in inverted faces?

G Rhodes1, S Brake, A P Atkinson

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Cognition
|April 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Encapsulation of a 5FU-curcumin hybrid on bacterial nanocellulose for colorectal cancer treatment.

International journal of biological macromolecules·2024
Same author

Accuracy in Facial Trustworthiness Impressions: Kernel of Truth or Modern Physiognomy? A Meta-Analysis.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2021
Same author

Dissolved organic nutrient uptake by riverine phytoplankton varies along a gradient of nutrient enrichment.

The Science of the total environment·2020
Same author

Risk communication in the dental practice.

British dental journal·2016
Same author

HEALTH VALUES.

British medical journal·2010
Same author

Estimation of inhibitory quotient using a comparative equilibrium dialysis assay for prediction of viral response to hepatitis C virus inhibitors.

Journal of viral hepatitis·2010
Same journal

When criterion control in face matching induces correlation: Commentary on Baker et al. (2026).

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Productivity matters for the neural processing of novel words, but not existing ones" Cognition Volume 274 (2026) 106593.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Investigating the origins of partisanship: What motivates children to preferentially endorse their ingroups' claims?

Cognition·2026
Same journal

People make graded judgments about the inconceivable.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

The self as an image: Appearance and belief in visual representations of one's own face.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to 'Consonant, vowel, and tone cues in early wordform recognition: Evidence from Cantonese-learning infants' [Cognition 275 (2026) 106624].

Cognition·2026
See all related articles

Inversion significantly impairs recognition of relational facial features more than isolated ones, supporting the theory that experts use configural coding for complex stimuli like faces. This highlights an ambiguity in distinguishing isolated versus relational features.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Face recognition is often impaired when faces are inverted.
  • This impairment is thought to reflect a reliance on relational features for configural coding.
  • Previous research has not directly compared inversion effects on isolated versus relational features.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To directly investigate whether inversion disrupts relational feature coding more than isolated feature coding.
  • To test the hypothesis that disproportionate inversion effects indicate relational coding strategies.
  • To examine the role of feature context in inversion effects.

Main Methods:

  • Three studies were conducted comparing inversion decrements for detecting changes across an isolated-relational feature continuum.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Stimuli included changes to facial hair, glasses (isolated features), Thatcher illusion, and internal feature spacing (relational features).
  • Experiments 2 and 3 presented facial features out of context to assess the role of spontaneous relational coding.

    • Main Results:

    • Significantly larger inversion decrements were observed for relational features (Thatcher illusion, internal spacing) compared to isolated features (facial hair, glasses).
    • Changes to eyes and mouth showed a large inversion decrement when in context, but this disappeared when features were out of context.
    • The results support the interpretation that inversion effects reflect the disruption of relational, configural coding.

    Conclusions:

    • Disproportionate inversion effects provide evidence for relational coding in face recognition.
    • The findings suggest that even seemingly isolated features (eyes, mouth) are processed relationally within the face context.
    • The study identifies ambiguity in classifying features as isolated or relational, prompting re-evaluation of configural coding concepts.