Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

09:16
Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers
Published on: March 14, 2018
Critical values for evaluating CELF-R Receptive and Expressive Language Score discrepancies
1Department of Communication Disorders, Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans 70112-2262.
Perceptual and Motor Skills
|April 1, 1993
Summary
This study provides critical values for the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals--Revised (CELF-R) to assess language skills in children. These values help determine if score differences in language comprehension and production are statistically significant for psychoeducational evaluations.
Area of Science:
- Child Psychology
- Speech-Language Pathology
- Educational Psychology
Background:
- Psychoeducational evaluations are crucial for identifying developmental and learning disorders in school-aged children.
- Assessing language comprehension and production skills is a key component of these evaluations.
- Interpreting score discrepancies requires reliable statistical methods to ensure diagnostic accuracy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present a table of critical values for the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals--Revised (CELF-R).
- To provide clinicians with a tool to evaluate the statistical significance of observed score discrepancies in language skills.
- To aid in the accurate psychoeducational diagnosis of children with language impairments.
Main Methods:
- The study involves the statistical analysis of normative data from the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals--Revised (CELF-R).
- Critical values were calculated to establish thresholds for statistical significance.
- A table of these critical values is presented for practical application.
Main Results:
- A comprehensive table of critical values for the CELF-R is provided.
- These values allow for the objective assessment of the statistical significance of score differences between language comprehension and production.
- The findings facilitate a more rigorous interpretation of CELF-R results.
Conclusions:
- The presented critical values enhance the diagnostic utility of the CELF-R in psychoeducational settings.
- Statistically significant discrepancies in CELF-R scores can inform targeted interventions for language disorders.
- This resource supports evidence-based practices in child language assessment.

