Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Managed competition that works

P Caper1

  • 1Codman Research Group, Inc, Lebanon, NH 03766.

JAMA
|May 19, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This proposal outlines a national health insurance system using managed competition and global budgets to control costs and expand access. It features a trust fund, vouchers, and a standard benefits package to achieve universal coverage and efficiency.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Information needs in a changing health care system: capitation and the need for a population-oriented view.

The Journal of ambulatory care management·2001
Same author

Clinician versus policymaker.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2001
Same author

Utilization analysis and physician profiling--new paradigm, old paradigm.

Surgical endoscopy·1995
Same author

The next shift: managed care.

Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)·1995
Same author

Shifting to a new medical care paradigm.

InfoCare : information strategies for healthcare networks·1995
Same author

The microanatomy of health care.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·1993

Area of Science:

  • Health Policy and Economics
  • Healthcare Systems Reform
  • Public Health Insurance Models

Background:

  • Current healthcare systems face challenges in balancing cost control with universal access.
  • Managed competition has been proposed but requires integration with financing and capacity management strategies.
  • Previous models often struggle to achieve both cost containment and equitable access simultaneously.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a novel proposal for a national health insurance system that integrates managed competition with global budgeting.
  • To demonstrate how seemingly conflicting goals of cost control and expanded access can be achieved.
  • To reform healthcare financing, payment, and system capacity.

Main Methods:

  • Establishment of a single, trust-funded national health insurance system.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Implementation through individual vouchers with annually determined values for global budgeting.
  • Capitation payments from the trust fund to health plans, allowing negotiation with providers.
  • Mandatory standard benefits package with flexibility for supplemental offerings.

    • Main Results:

    • Potential for firm national budget limits and universal, comprehensive insurance coverage.
    • Elimination of cost shifting and encouragement of competition and innovation.
    • Reduced need for centralized healthcare management while retaining local determination.
    • Maintains a degree of consumer choice within the system.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed 'Managed Competition That Works' model offers a viable framework for simultaneous healthcare cost control and access expansion.
    • Trust funds could potentially be adapted for state-level implementation if benefit portability issues are resolved.
    • This integrated approach addresses systemic inefficiencies and promotes a more equitable healthcare landscape.