Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Rationing surgery: rules or constraints?

J D Birkmeyer1, H G Welch

  • 1Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, N.H.

Surgery
|May 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Influence of national centralization of oesophagogastric cancer on management and clinical outcome from emergency upper gastrointestinal conditions.

The British journal of surgery·2017
Same author

Progress and challenges in improving surgical outcomes.

The British journal of surgery·2012
Same author

Case mix, quality and high-cost kidney transplant patients.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2009
Same author

The effects of donor and recipient practices on transplant center finances.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2008
Same author

Decision analysis for small, asymptomatic intracranial arteriovenous malformations.

Neurosurgical focus·2006
Same author

A prospective study comparing the complication rates between laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs.

Surgical endoscopy·2003
Same journal

Outcomes following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in nonagenarian patients.

Surgery·2026
Same journal

Fistulotomy with primary sphincteroplasty for complex anal fistulas: Should we be concerned about incontinence?

Surgery·2026
Same journal

No need for mesh in the repair of hiatal hernias: Autologous tissue hiatoplasty techniques for the repair of the complex diaphragmatic defect.

Surgery·2026
Same journal

Incretin-based therapies and altered myocardial metabolism in a swine model of ischemic heart disease in the setting of metabolic syndrome.

Surgery·2026
Same journal

Colonoscopy utilization and persistent disparities in early onset colorectal cancer: A multistate, multi-institution nested case-control study.

Surgery·2026
Same journal

From blades to heels: Lessons in performance from the ice to the practice of surgery.

Surgery·2026
See all related articles

Rising healthcare costs necessitate surgical rationing. This study examines two methods: explicit rules set by payers and resource constraints managed by surgeons, each with distinct implications for patient care and professional autonomy.

Area of Science:

  • Health Policy
  • Surgical Ethics
  • Healthcare Economics

Background:

  • Increasing U.S. healthcare expenditures highlight the need for limits on surgical procedures.
  • The establishment and responsibility for setting these surgical limits remain critical questions.
  • This article explores two primary frameworks for implementing such limitations: rules and constraints.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the implications of two fundamental approaches to rationing surgical care: rules versus constraints.
  • To evaluate how each approach impacts healthcare providers, patients, and societal interests.
  • To inform surgeons on the best methods for managing surgical resource allocation.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of two rationing strategies: explicit rules and resource constraints.
Keywords:
Health Care and Public HealthMedicaidNational Health Service

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of the advantages and disadvantages of each approach concerning feasibility, clinical judgment, and patient outcomes.
  • Discussion of the role of surgeons and policymakers in implementing care limits.

    • Main Results:

    • Rules offer explicitness but struggle with patient heterogeneity and data limitations for procedure ranking.
    • Constraints allow for clinical judgment and surgeon autonomy but face challenges in defining adequate resources and ensuring efficacy-based rationing.
    • Rules remove the rationing burden from surgeons, while constraints place it upon them.

    Conclusions:

    • Surgeons must carefully weigh the benefits and drawbacks of both rule-based and constraint-based rationing.
    • The chosen approach should align with the professional interests of surgeons, the well-being of patients, and broader societal goals.
    • Consideration of rationing strategies is essential for responsible surgical practice in the face of rising healthcare costs.