Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Spatial resolution in digital mammography

N Karssemeijer1, J T Frieling, J H Hendriks

  • 1University Hospital Nijmegen, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The Netherlands.

Investigative Radiology
|May 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Minimally invasive breast cancer excision using the breast lesion excision system under ultrasound guidance.

Breast cancer research and treatment·2020
Same author

Reliability of MRI tumor size measurements for minimal invasive treatment selection in small breast cancers.

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology·2020
Same author

Can a channelized Hotelling observer assess image quality in acquired mammographic images of an anthropomorphic breast phantom including image processing?

Medical physics·2018
Same author

Reasons for (non)participation in supplemental population-based MRI breast screening for women with extremely dense breasts.

Clinical radiology·2018
Same author

The frequency of missed breast cancers in women participating in a high-risk MRI screening program.

Breast cancer research and treatment·2018
Same author

The importance of early detection of calcifications associated with breast cancer in screening.

Breast cancer research and treatment·2017
Same journal

3D Freehand Ultrasound Imaging of Optic Nerve Sheath.

Investigative radiology·2026
Same journal

Iodinated Contrast Media Hypersensitivity in 115,966 Patients: Risk Factors, Severity Profiles, and the Impact of Iodine Concentration on Reaction Risk.

Investigative radiology·2026
Same journal

Improvement of Lung Nodule Volumetric Accuracy with Photon-counting Computed Tomography Over Energy-integrating Computed Tomography in Low-dose Screening: A Phantom Study.

Investigative radiology·2026
Same journal

Photon-counting CT in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Improved Metal Artifact Reduction and Impact on Bone Fusion Assessment.

Investigative radiology·2026
Same journal

Quantitative Synthetic MRI in Body Imaging: Technical Basis, Current Applications, and Future Directions.

Investigative radiology·2026
Same journal

Nonclinical Safety Assessment of Digadoglucitol, a Novel Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agent for the Central Nervous System.

Investigative radiology·2026
See all related articles

High-quality digital mammography is achievable with a spatial resolution of 0.1 mm/pixel. This study found that digital mammography maintains diagnostic performance, even with lower resolutions for detecting microcalcifications and other details.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Radiology
  • Digital Health

Background:

  • Current digital mammography systems have spatial resolution limitations around 0.1 mm/pixel.
  • Assessing the impact of this resolution on diagnostic accuracy is crucial for clinical adoption.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate if high-quality mammography is possible at a spatial resolution of 0.1 mm/pixel.
  • To compare observer performance between film-screen and digitized mammography.

Main Methods:

  • Investigated spatial resolution's influence on diagnostic quality by comparing film and digitized images.
  • Measured threshold contrast for detecting details (0.12-2.5 mm) and used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for microcalcification characterization.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Digitization enhanced detection of larger, low-contrast objects but not small ones.
  • Isolated microcalcifications <0.13 mm were undetectable even with film-screen mammography.
  • Microcalcification cluster characterization showed no significant change, with slight improvements in malignancy differentiation and characterization.

Conclusions:

  • A spatial resolution of 0.1 mm/pixel is sufficient for high-quality digital mammography.
  • Diagnostic performance is not significantly compromised at this resolution, suggesting its clinical viability.