Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

How to critically evaluate positions on obstetric ethics

F A Chervenak¹, L B McCullough

¹Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York Hospital Cornell Medical Center, New York 10021.

The Journal of Reproductive Medicine

|April 1, 1993

Summary

This study presents three essential tools for critically evaluating obstetric ethics positions. These include distinguishing descriptive from normative ethics, applying the "Six Cs" framework, and recognizing inherent limitations in contributing fields.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Current challenges in intrauterine management of obstructive fetal hydrocephalus and future directions.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2025

Same author

Prenatal diagnosis and characterization of extra-axial, supratentorial pial arteriovenous malformation using high-resolution transvaginal neurosonography.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2022

Same author

Elective delivery at 34 weeks vs routine obstetric care in fetal gastroschisis: randomized controlled trial.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2019

Same author

Preventing enthusiasm in response to clinical advances.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2019

Same author

The European Court of Human Rights on planned home birth: resolution of a paradoxical ruling.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2017

Same author

The unlimited-rights model of obstetric ethics threatens professionalism.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2017

Area of Science:

Obstetrics and Gynecology
Bioethics
Medical Ethics

Background:

Ethical considerations in obstetrics are complex and require rigorous evaluation.
Existing frameworks for ethical analysis in obstetrics may lack comprehensive critical appraisal tools.

Purpose of the Study:

To introduce and elaborate on three distinct tools for the critical evaluation of positions within obstetric ethics.
To enhance the rigor and clarity of ethical arguments in obstetrics.

Main Methods:

Distinguishing between descriptive and normative obstetric ethics.
Applying the "Six Cs" framework: clarity, consistency, coherence, clinical applicability, clinical adequacy, and completeness.
Identifying and avoiding common pitfalls related to the limitations of contributing fields (law, region, professional consensus, authority, philosophy).

Keywords:

Analytical Approach Bioethics and Professional Ethics

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

The proposed three-tool approach provides a structured method for critical ethical analysis in obstetrics.
Enhanced clarity and consistency in ethical arguments are achievable through the "Six Cs" framework.
Awareness of limitations in contributing fields prevents flawed ethical reasoning.

Conclusions:

The integration of these three tools offers a robust methodology for advancing critical thinking in obstetric ethics.
This framework supports more sound and clinically relevant ethical decision-making in obstetrics.
Further application of these tools can refine ethical discourse and practice in the field of obstetrics.