The arts of war and medicine: a study in symbiosis

Practitioners of warfare and medicine have both considered their respective disciplines part art and part science. Each has seen dramatic advances over the past several centuries, and the histories of progress in warfare and medical practice are inextricably intertwined. For example, the congregation of large armies inspired the development of epidemiologic analysis and preventive medicine, which forestalled the disastrous loss of life that typified all wars through the U.S. Civil War. Warfare also helped to clarify the critical distinction between medicine and health in several ways. Battles generate tremendous demands on the trauma surgeon, which triggers advances in understanding of trauma, surgery, fluid and electrolyte management, first aid, and triage. Similarly, the health of soldiers before and after combat is a result of public health measures that physicians have been ill-suited to manage. The dramatic severity of epidemics in armies progressively forced health professionals and politicians to seek solutions to illnesses that had plagued the general population to lesser degrees for millennia. The exigencies of war inspired creation of the nursing profession, with the burden and opportunity falling on women. Women were not allowed to hold positions of responsibility in caring for the sick until the enormity of the Civil War prevented men from occupying all such positions. Because each generation tends to view itself as "modern," its inherent weaknesses often go uncorrected and even unobserved. The interconnected histories of war and medicine provide a warning to remain open to discovering those practices that need radical reform to prevent the current generation of physicians from appearing utterly ridiculous to physicians 100 years hence. This treatise focuses, therefore, on the symbiotic advances in warfare on health before this century because death in war due to trauma was statistically far less important than death due to disease.