Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Focusing of Light in the Eye01:16

Focusing of Light in the Eye

Light rays enter the eye through the cornea, a transparent dome-shaped tissue that is the eye's outermost layer. The cornea bends or refracts, light rays traveling to the pupil. The shape of the cornea determines how much of the light is bent and whether the image will be focused correctly on the retina at the back of the eye. Once the light has passed through both refraction layers, it converges into a single focal point onto a small area. This is where photoreceptors start transforming...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Low-carbohydrate ketogenic diet in Mc Ardle's disease: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial.

Journal of neurology·2025
Same author

Emerging synthetic cannabinoids detected by a drug checking service in Toronto, Canada.

Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2022
Same author

The impact of 3,4-methylendioxymetamphetamine (MDMA) abstinence on seeking behavior and the expression of the D<sub>2</sub>-like and mGlu<sub>5</sub> receptors in the rat brain using saturation binding analyses.

Journal of physiology and pharmacology : an official journal of the Polish Physiological Society·2020
Same author

The effect of myo-inositol, vitamin D3 and melatonin on the oocyte quality and pregnancy in in vitro fertilization: a randomized prospective controlled trial.

European review for medical and pharmacological sciences·2020
Same author

Multimodal MRI Longitudinal Assessment of White and Gray Matter in Different SPG Types of Hereditary Spastic Paraparesis.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2020
Same author

[Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Instrumentation - Outcomes at 24-Month Follow-up].

Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca·2020
Same journal

[Macular serpiginous choroiditis complicated by macular hole].

Oftalmologia (Bucharest, Romania : 1990)·2015
Same journal

[Therapeutic approach in persistent diabetic macular edema].

Oftalmologia (Bucharest, Romania : 1990)·2015
Same journal

[Preliminary results of treatment with aflibercept].

Oftalmologia (Bucharest, Romania : 1990)·2015
Same journal

MANAGEMENT OF DIABETIC RETINOPATHY, PREVALENCE AND CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION.

Oftalmologia (Bucharest, Romania : 1990)·2015
Same journal

[Changes in intraocular pressure depending on posture].

Oftalmologia (Bucharest, Romania : 1990)·2015
Same journal

[Treatment for penetrating wound caused by metallic intraocular foreign body].

Oftalmologia (Bucharest, Romania : 1990)·2015
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 29, 2026

Fiber-optic Implantation for Chronic Optogenetic Stimulation of Brain Tissue
10:18

Fiber-optic Implantation for Chronic Optogenetic Stimulation of Brain Tissue

Published on: October 29, 2012

[The artificial lens implant]

B Cârstocea1, D Selaru, M Filip

  • 1Spitalul Militar Central Bucureşti.

Oftalmologia (Bucharest, Romania : 1990)
|March 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This review examines the historical development of cataract surgery, focusing on the evolution from early procedures to modern artificial lens implantation. It highlights the current dominance of posterior chamber lenses, which are used in the vast majority of modern cases. The article also provides an overview of various surgical techniques, patient recovery patterns, and clinical success rates.

Keywords:
ophthalmology historyintraocular lenssurgical outcomesvision restoration

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

In Vivo Targeted Expression of Optogenetic Proteins Using Silk/AAV Films
06:11

In Vivo Targeted Expression of Optogenetic Proteins Using Silk/AAV Films

Published on: February 26, 2019

Microfabrication of Implantable Optics Integrated in a Microstructured Imaging Window for Advanced In Vivo Imaging
07:14

Microfabrication of Implantable Optics Integrated in a Microstructured Imaging Window for Advanced In Vivo Imaging

Published on: April 11, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 29, 2026

Fiber-optic Implantation for Chronic Optogenetic Stimulation of Brain Tissue
10:18

Fiber-optic Implantation for Chronic Optogenetic Stimulation of Brain Tissue

Published on: October 29, 2012

In Vivo Targeted Expression of Optogenetic Proteins Using Silk/AAV Films
06:11

In Vivo Targeted Expression of Optogenetic Proteins Using Silk/AAV Films

Published on: February 26, 2019

Microfabrication of Implantable Optics Integrated in a Microstructured Imaging Window for Advanced In Vivo Imaging
07:14

Microfabrication of Implantable Optics Integrated in a Microstructured Imaging Window for Advanced In Vivo Imaging

Published on: April 11, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology research within artificial lens implant technology
  • Surgical innovation and clinical outcomes analysis

Background:

Cataract surgery has undergone significant transformations throughout medical history. Early practitioners struggled with managing lens luxation within the vitreous cavity. These initial challenges necessitated the development of more stable corrective measures. No prior work had resolved the transition from primitive methods to modern prosthetic solutions. Surgeons eventually sought ways to replace the clouded natural lens with synthetic alternatives. This gap motivated the exploration of various intraocular device designs. Prior research has shown that early attempts often lacked the precision required for long-term patient safety. That uncertainty drove the refinement of surgical approaches to improve visual outcomes for patients worldwide.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this review is to document the historical progression of cataract intervention techniques. It seeks to map the journey from early management of lens luxation to contemporary prosthetic solutions. The study addresses the need for a clear understanding of how surgical practices have matured. By analyzing different classes of implants, the authors clarify why certain designs have become dominant. This work provides a structured overview of the evolution of ocular surgery. The researchers intend to highlight the transition toward more reliable, modern surgical methods. This effort helps practitioners appreciate the significance of current operative standards. The motivation stems from a desire to synthesize decades of clinical experience into a coherent narrative.

Main Methods:

Review Approach involves a comprehensive examination of historical surgical records. The authors synthesize data from various developmental stages of ocular procedures. They evaluate the transition from managing vitreous luxation to modern prosthetic integration. This analysis incorporates a broad survey of diverse operative maneuvers. The researchers compare different classes of synthetic devices to determine current clinical standards. They also assess post-operative recovery patterns documented in medical literature. This systematic investigation focuses on identifying the most effective contemporary practices. The study approach relies on summarizing established outcomes to provide a clear overview of the field.

Main Results:

Key Findings From the Literature demonstrate that posterior chamber devices are the most common choice for modern patients. These specific implants are utilized in 80% of all current surgical cases. The overall rate of artificial lens implantation has reached 80% of total cataract interventions. These figures highlight the dominance of current prosthetic technology in clinical settings. The literature confirms that various operative techniques have evolved to support these high success rates. Patients generally experience favorable post-operative evolution following these modern procedures. The data indicates a clear shift toward standardized, high-performance lens options. These results underscore the effectiveness of contemporary surgical strategies in restoring patient vision.

Conclusions:

Synthesis and Implications reveal that posterior chamber devices currently represent the standard of care. These implants account for the majority of modern surgical interventions. Authors suggest that the shift toward these specific designs reflects improved safety profiles. Clinical data indicates that current techniques provide reliable visual restoration for most individuals. The review highlights that patient recovery remains a critical phase of the overall procedure. Success rates are largely attributed to the refinement of operative maneuvers over several decades. Practitioners should prioritize these established methods to ensure optimal patient health. Future clinical practice will likely continue to build upon these successful surgical foundations.

The researchers propose that posterior chamber lenses are the preferred option, currently utilized in 80% of all cataract procedures. This high adoption rate contrasts with older, less stable surgical methods used for lens luxation.

The authors identify three distinct classes of prosthetic devices. Among these, the posterior chamber model stands out as the most prevalent tool, representing 80% of all implants performed today.

The review indicates that moving away from older techniques was necessary to address complications like lens luxation. Surgeons required more stable, modern implants to achieve consistent, long-term visual success.

The researchers utilize clinical data to categorize surgical trends. This information highlights the role of posterior chamber implants in achieving the current 80% success rate in modern ophthalmology.

The authors measure success through post-operative evolution and patient outcomes. These observations confirm that modern techniques yield superior results compared to historical approaches to cataract management.

The authors propose that the widespread adoption of posterior chamber implants is the most significant implication of their review. They suggest that these devices have effectively standardized modern cataract care.