Accuracy of the Endex with variations in canal irrigants and foramen size

Several electronic apex locators (EALs) are currently available. The manufacturer of a new device, the Endex, claims that it is accurate regardless of canal conditions. This study compared the accuracy of the Endex with that of the Exact-a-pex, the Sono-Explorer Mark III, and the Neosono-D SE as to the effects of fluids in the canal and variation in foramen size. Sixty extracted single-canaled teeth were divided into two groups (narrow and wide foramina), depending on whether the apical foramina permitted the tip of a #30 K file to pass through. An in vitro model was used, in which teeth were fitted in test tubes with the roots immersed in 1% agar in phosphate-buffered saline. Root canal lengths were measured in dry canals, then with ethanol, Xylocaine, and sodium hypochlorite in the canals by each electronic apex locator. These lengths were compared with those of the actual root canal lengths. No significant differences were noted among the instruments in dry canals regardless of the foramen size. The endex was generally superior to the other instruments examined in canals containing conductive fluids, especially where the apical foramen was widened.