Femorocrural grafting and regrafting: does polytetrafluoroethylene have a role?

Between 1980 and 1988, 263 patients received 307 femorocrural bypass grafts. 180 were primary infrainguinal grafts, 106 secondary, 18 tertiary and three quaternary. Rest pain or tissue loss was the indication in 96% of cases. Outflow vessels were the tibioperoneal trunk (n = 34), posterior tibial artery (n = 115), peroneal artery (n = 89) and anterior tibial artery (n = 69). 88 primary vein grafts were completed. 201 polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts were inserted (92 primary and 109 subsequent reconstructions). There were no direct PTFE to crural vessel anastomoses. A Miller cuff was used in the majority (n = 175). The three year primary patency for primary vein grafts (36%) was similar to primary PTFE grafts (29%), but significantly higher than subsequent PTFE grafts (20%) (p = 0.03). Three year foot salvage for primary vein grafts (65%) was similar to primary PTFE (64%), but significantly better than subsequent PTFE (42%) (p = 0.02). The results support both redo femorocrural grafting for critical ischaemia, as judged by foot salvage rates, and the use of PTFE with a distal vein cuff in primary and subsequent femorocrural reconstruction if autologous vein is not available.