Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Systematic and random errors associated with Johnston's cephalometric analysis

S D Keeling1, S R Cabassa, G J King

  • 1Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville 32610.

British Journal of Orthodontics
|May 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary

The Johnston cephalometric method showed no systematic errors but significant random errors in assessing Class II malocclusion correction. These random errors limit its clinical utility for individual skeletal and dental change evaluations.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Search for Evidence of Baryogenesis and Dark Matter in B^{+}→ψ_{D}+p Decays at BABAR.

Physical review letters·2023
Same author

Search for an Axionlike Particle in B Meson Decays.

Physical review letters·2022
Same author

Search for Lepton Flavor Violation in ϒ(3S)→e^{±}μ^{∓}.

Physical review letters·2022
Same author

Search for Darkonium in e^{+}e^{-} Collisions.

Physical review letters·2022
Same author

Precision Measurement of the Ratio B(ϒ(3S)→τ^{+}τ^{-})/B(ϒ(3S)→μ^{+}μ^{-}).

Physical review letters·2021
Same author

Search for a Dark Leptophilic Scalar in e^{+}e^{-} Collisions.

Physical review letters·2020

Area of Science:

  • Orthodontics
  • Cephalometric analysis
  • Dental radiography

Background:

  • Cephalometric analysis is crucial for evaluating skeletal and dental changes in orthodontics.
  • Johnston's method is a common technique for assessing treatment outcomes, particularly for Class II malocclusions.
  • Understanding the reliability of cephalometric measurements is essential for accurate clinical decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the systematic and random errors of Johnston's cephalometric method.
  • To assess intra- and inter-examiner reliability in measuring skeletal and dental changes.
  • To determine the clinical utility of Johnston's analysis for individual patient assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Radiographic tracings from 30 mixed dentition subjects treated for Class II malocclusion were analyzed.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Measurements included molar/incisor movements, apical base changes, maxillary/mandibular displacement, and overjet reduction.
  • Paired t-tests and reliability analyses were used to quantify systematic and random errors.

    • Main Results:

    • No systematic errors were found for linear or angular measurements.
    • Inter-examiner random errors exceeded intra-examiner errors for 12 out of 13 parameters.
    • Measures of molar correction and overjet reduction exhibited the least random error variance.

    Conclusions:

    • Johnston's cephalometric method demonstrates high reliability for assessing molar correction and overjet reduction.
    • Significant random errors in assessing skeletal changes, particularly mandibular position, limit the method's clinical utility for individual cases.
    • Further refinement or alternative methods may be needed for precise individual assessment of skeletal changes.