Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison of different oxygen exchange models

C P Van der Ploeg1, J Dankelman, H G Stassen

  • 1Laboratory for Measurement and Contrey, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Marine Technology, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands.

Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
|September 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Validation of a hand hygiene visual feedback system to improve compliance with drying time of alcohol-based hand rub in a neonatal intensive care unit: the Incubator Traffic Light system.

The Journal of hospital infection·2024
Same author

Inflicted head-injury by shaking-trauma in infants: the importance of spatiotemporal variations of the head's rotation center.

Scientific reports·2023
Same author

Feasibility of Narrow-Band Imaging, Intraductal Biopsy, and Laser Ablation During Mammary Ductoscopy: Protocol for an Interventional Study.

International journal of surgery protocols·2022
Same author

Correction to: Energetic soft-tissue treatment technologies: an overview of procedural fundamentals and safety factors.

Surgical endoscopy·2022
Same author

Safe implementation of hand held steerable laparoscopic instruments: a survey among EAES surgeons.

Updates in surgery·2022
Same author

SATA-LRS: A modular and novel steerable hand-held laparoscopic instrument platform for low-resource settings<sup>☆</sup>.

Medical engineering & physics·2022

Estimating coronary volume using arterio-venous O2 content difference (AVO2) response is reliable. More realistic O2 exchange models show minimal errors, validating the standard reference model for coronary volume estimations.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Physiology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Oxygen Transport

Background:

  • Estimating coronary volume relies on arterio-venous O2 content difference (AVO2) response to flow changes.
  • The accuracy of these estimations is contingent upon the chosen O2 exchange model.
  • The conventional approach uses a single mixed compartment model (reference model).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify errors in coronary volume estimations arising from simplified O2 exchange models.
  • To evaluate the impact of factors like flow heterogeneity and Krogh-like exchange on volume estimates.
  • To validate the reliability of the standard reference model against more complex scenarios.

Main Methods:

  • Simulated AVO2 transients using alternative O2 exchange models incorporating flow heterogeneity and different mixing sites.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Fitted simulated transients from alternative models to the standard reference model.
  • Compared estimated volumes from the reference model to the actual volumes used in the alternative models.

    • Main Results:

    • Alternative models with Krogh characteristics yielded significant volume estimation differences, but were deemed unrealistic due to high capillary pO2.
    • More biologically plausible alternative models resulted in only minor discrepancies compared to the reference model.
    • The reference model provided coronary volume estimations of 9.9 ml/100g for O2 exchange vessels and 3.8 ml/100g for distal venous volume.

    Conclusions:

    • The standard reference model provides a well-approximated estimation of coronary volumes.
    • Complex O2 exchange factors introduce minimal error in volume estimations when using realistic models.
    • The findings support the continued use of the reference model for functional coronary volume assessment.