Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Process dissociation, single-process theories, and recognition memory

R Ratcliff1, T Van Zandt, G McKoon

  • 1Psychology Department, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
|December 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sequential Sampling Models in Cognitive Neuroscience: Advantages, Applications, and Extensions.

Annual review of psychology·2015
Same author

Set size and order requirements in immediate memory.

Memory & cognition·2013
Same author

Statistical mimicking of reaction time data: Single-process models, parameter variability, and mixtures.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Conceptual combinations and relational contexts in free association and in priming in lexical decision and naming.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Expression and regulation of the Na+-K+-2Cl- cotransporter NKCC1 in the normal and CFTR-deficient murine colon.

The Journal of physiology·2003
Same author

cAMP-mediated regulation of murine intestinal/pancreatic Na+/HCO3- cotransporter subtype pNBC1.

American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology·2002
Same journal

Executive function and social behavior: Causal evidence from loading working memory and inhibitory control.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Your research is public engagement: A case for more intentional science communication in research with human subjects" by Vaughn (2026).

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Costs and benefits of acting extraverted: A randomized controlled trial" by Jacques-Hamilton et al. (2019).

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Conveying (discrete) emotionality with novel words.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Physical actions shape moral choices: Environment-directed movements reduce cheating in young children.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

From chunks to schemas: Learning in the Hebb repetition paradigm.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
See all related articles

The process dissociation method may not accurately estimate recognition memory components. This study used computational modeling to test the method's validity under different memory process assumptions.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Memory Research

Background:

  • Recognition memory is often modeled as relying on familiarity and recollection.
  • The process dissociation method estimates these two components of recognition memory.
  • The accuracy of this method under alternative theoretical assumptions is not well understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the validity of the process dissociation method.
  • To determine if the method provides accurate estimates when recognition memory relies on a single process or different two-process models.
  • To assess the impact of underlying process assumptions on the method's output.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the SAM (Search of Associative Memory) model to simulate recognition memory data.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Generated simulated data based on a single-process assumption using the SAM model.
  • Generated simulated data based on two-process assumptions using variants of the SAM model and the Atkinson & Juola model.

    • Main Results:

    • The study simulated data under various theoretical assumptions about recognition memory processes.
    • The simulated data were used to evaluate the accuracy of the process dissociation method's component estimates.
    • Analysis focused on whether the method's estimates align with the simulated underlying processes.

    Conclusions:

    • The process dissociation method's accuracy is contingent on the correctness of its underlying assumptions about memory processes.
    • Computational modeling provides a rigorous way to test the validity of psychological measurement methods.
    • Further research is needed to refine or validate memory assessment techniques.