Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Visual-auditory interaction in speeded classification: role of stimulus difference

E Ben-Artzi1, L E Marks

  • 1John B. Pierce Laboratory, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Perception & Psychophysics
|November 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Stimulus-Onset-Asynchrony as the Main Cue in Temporal Order Judgment.

Audiology research·2015
Same author

Auditory Temporal Processes in the Elderly.

Audiology research·2015
Same author

The perplexing plurality of psychophysical processes.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2014
Same author

Anxiety sensitivity and auditory perception of heartbeat.

Behaviour research and therapy·2006
Same author

Valid across-group comparisons with labeled scales: the gLMS versus magnitude matching.

Physiology & behavior·2004
Same author

Chemosensory context effects: role of perceived similarity and neural commonality.

Chemical senses·2000
Same journal

Response organization in selective adaptation to speech sounds.

Perception & psychophysics·2014
Same journal

Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Simple and contingent adaptation effects for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory property detectors and processing place features in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities.

Perception & psychophysics·2008
See all related articles

This study on cross-modal interference found that both visual and auditory stimuli can interfere with classification tasks. Pitch classification was more affected by interference and congruence effects than position classification.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Auditory Perception
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Cross-modal interference and congruence effects are key phenomena in perception.
  • Understanding these effects helps elucidate how sensory information is processed and integrated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate cross-modal interference and congruence in speeded classification tasks.
  • To compare the effects of visual and auditory irrelevant dimensions on classification performance.

Main Methods:

  • Subjects performed speeded classification of compound visual-auditory stimuli.
  • Stimuli varied in pitch (auditory) and spatial position (visual) with controlled differences.
  • 16 conditions combined different tone and dot pairs.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Both Garner interference and congruence effects were observed in both visual and auditory judgments.
  • Pitch classification exhibited stronger interference and congruence effects than position classification.
  • Pitch difference size impacted pitch classification significantly, while position difference size had no effect.

Conclusions:

  • Garner interference and congruence effects may share a common underlying mechanism.
  • Asymmetries in these effects could be influenced by the overlap between stimulus dimensions and response requirements.