Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Preferential processing of target features in texture segmentation

C T Scialfa1, K M Joffe

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.

Perception & Psychophysics
|November 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hazard perception in emergency medical service responders.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2016
Same author

Visual search for traffic signs: the effects of clutter, luminance, and aging.

Human factors·2001
Same author

Aging, texture segmentation, and exposure duration: evidence for a deficit is preattentive processing.

Experimental aging research·2001
Same author

Aging and the development of automaticity in conjunction search.

The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences·2000
Same author

Age differences in saccadic averaging.

Psychology and aging·2000
Same author

Age, target-distractor similarity, and visual search.

Experimental aging research·1998
Same journal

Response organization in selective adaptation to speech sounds.

Perception & psychophysics·2014
Same journal

Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Simple and contingent adaptation effects for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory property detectors and processing place features in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities.

Perception & psychophysics·2008
See all related articles

Visual search involves prioritizing target detection over orientation identification. Target presence interferes with processing surrounding information, suggesting a rapid initial detection followed by slower feature analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Visual perception
  • Computational neuroscience

Background:

  • Visual search tasks are crucial for understanding attentional mechanisms.
  • Differentiating target features from background elements is a fundamental aspect of visual processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the interplay between target detection and feature orientation identification in visual search.
  • To determine the temporal dynamics of target presence versus feature information processing.
  • To test a computational model of visual attention and search.

Main Methods:

  • Five experiments involving texture target detection and element orientation identification.
  • Varying observer tasks to include target detection, target orientation identification, and surround orientation identification.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of accuracy differences between target-present and target-absent trials.

    • Main Results:

    • Observers were significantly less accurate at identifying nontarget orientation compared to detecting target presence.
    • Target orientation identification accuracy approached 100%, while surround orientation accuracy decreased when targets were present.
    • Target presence information is processed faster than target feature information.

    Conclusions:

    • Visual attention prioritizes target detection over detailed feature analysis.
    • Target presence interferes with the processing of surrounding visual information.
    • Findings support a dual-stage model of visual search: a fast generalized difference operator followed by a slower feature comparison process.