Related Experiment Videos
Low energy endocardial cardioversion of atrial arrhythmias in humans
J M Kalman1, E F Jones, L Doolan
1Department of Cardiology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg Melbourne, Australia.
Insights
Low energy endocardial defibrillation is feasible for atrial flutter but less effective for atrial fibrillation. This study explored its use in patients unresponsive to amiodarone, showing promise for flutter termination with specific electrode configurations.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- Amiodarone is a common pharmacological treatment for atrial arrhythmias.
- Failure of pharmacological reversion necessitates alternative treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the feasibility of low energy endocardial defibrillation for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter.
- To evaluate different electrode configurations for endocardial defibrillation.
Main Methods:
- Nine patients (5 with atrial flutter, 4 with atrial fibrillation) underwent low energy endocardial defibrillation under general anesthesia.
- Large surface area endocardial leads were placed in the right atrial appendage and right ventricular apex, with a cutaneous patch electrode.
- Biphasic shocks were delivered using three sequential electrode configurations; transthoracic defibrillation was used if endocardial methods failed.
Main Results:
- Endocardial defibrillation successfully terminated atrial flutter in all five patients at low energy levels (0.5-10 J).
- Success was limited to one patient with atrial fibrillation at 10 J.
- No significant complications, including ventricular fibrillation, were observed.
Conclusions:
- Low energy endocardial defibrillation is feasible for atrial flutter using large surface area electrodes.
- Further research is needed to improve success rates for atrial fibrillation, potentially with different electrode configurations and in patients with recent-onset arrhythmias.
Abstract:
We assessed the feasibility of low energy endocardial defibrillation in patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter who had failed a trial of pharmacological reversion with amiodarone. Low energy endocardial defibrillation under general anesthesia was attempted in 9 patients, 5 with atrial flutter and 4 with atrial fibrillation (median duration of arrhythmia 3.75 months). Two large surface area endocardial leads were introduced percutaneously and sited in the right atrial appendage and at the right ventricular apex. A cutaneous patch electrode was placed on the left thorax. Biphasic shocks synchronized to the ventricular electrogram were used to terminate atrial arrhythmias. Three electrode configurations were evaluated in the following sequence at each energy level: atrial cathode to ventricular anode; ventricular cathode to atrial anode; atrial cathode to a combined ventricular and cutaneous anode. If endocardial defibrillation failed (0.5-10 J), transthoracic defibrillation using 200 joules followed by 360 joules, if required, was performed. Endocardial defibrillation was successful in all five patients with atrial flutter (0.5 J, 1.0 J, 1.0 J, 4.0 J, and 10.0 J) but in only one patient with atrial fibrillation (10 J). On no occasion did successful defibrillation occur with one configuration when it had failed with an alternate configuration at that particular energy level. Ventricular fibrillation did not occur, and there were no other significant complications. Low energy endocardial defibrillation is feasible in patients with atrial flutter using large surface area electrodes. Although the success rate of atrial defibrillation was low, further work is required, particularly in patients with more recent onset of the arrhythmia and using a right to left electrode configuration.