Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

Trans-vivo Delayed Type Hypersensitivity Assay for Antigen Specific Regulation
Published on: May 2, 2013
[Quantitative detection of pp65 intraleukocyte cytomegalic antigen in renal transplantation]
C Le Goff1, B Hurault de Ligny, F Freymuth
1Service de Néphrologie, CHU Clemenceau, Caen.
Objective:
To assess the clinical value of quantitative assay of leukocyte cytomegalovirus antigen (LCA) in the management of immunodepressed patients.
Methods:
Thirty-three kidney transplant recipients followed a weekly follow-up protocol during the first 3 months after transplantation. LCA was compared with cytomegalovirus (CMV) detection in blood using fibroblast cell culture and with serology tests. LCA was expressed in number of positive cells per 2.10(5) leukocytes, detected by immunofluorescence with a specific monoclonal antibody directed against the pp65 antigen. The standard culture method and a rapid centrifuge method were used for blood samples. The serum level of anti CMV antibodies was determined by ELISA.
Results:
CMV infection defined as positive viraemia and/or positive serology tests was diagnosed in 22 of the 33 patients. LCA was detected in 20 patients, including all those with clinical signs of infection. Serology was the only method giving a positive diagnosis in 2 patients and was negative in 3 infections positive for LCA. Viraemia was negative in 2 patients positive for LCA. LCA was detected in 60 of the 65 blood samples with a positive viraemia test and in 46 of the 165 negative samples (sensitivity 92% and specificity 72%). Quantitatively, LCA in samples taken from patients with clinical signs was higher than that in samples taken from asymptomatic patients (51 +/- 5 versus 20 +/- 2, p < 0.001). In addition, LCA was detected a mean 7.6 +/- 4 days before significant changes in serology tests, 2.2 +/- 1.6 days before the viraemia and 7.1 +/- 1 days before clinical manifestations.
Conclusion:
Leukocyte cytomegalovirus antigen gives a sensitive means of early positive diagnosis. The quantified level illustrates the patient's risk of infection. This new method is a very helpful tool in following renal transplantation recipients.
More Related Videos
18:48In Vitro and In Vivo Assessment of T, B and Myeloid Cells Suppressive Activity and Humoral Responses from Transplant Recipients
Published on: August 12, 2017
09:43Analyses of Proteinuria, Renal Infiltration of Leukocytes, and Renal Deposition of Proteins in Lupus-prone MRL/lpr Mice
Published on: June 8, 2022