Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Legal considerations for allogeneic blood transfusion

E B Goldman1

  • 1University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, USA.

American Journal of Surgery
|December 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

Patients can refuse blood transfusions, but legal standards require surgeons to discuss alternatives. This ensures informed consent and patient autonomy in surgical settings, balancing individual rights with medical considerations.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Adverse events in primary care identified from a risk-management database.

The Journal of family practice·1997
Same author

The patient's decision to receive a transfusion.

Transfusion·1993
Same author

Legal aspects of transfusion of Jehovah's Witnesses.

Transfusion medicine reviews·1991
Same author

Two views on COBRA.

Annals of emergency medicine·1989
Same author

Medico-legal consultation: an expanded role of the tertiary neonatologist.

Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association·1987
Same author

Legal aspects of abortion practice.

Clinics in obstetrics and gynaecology·1986

Area of Science:

  • Medical Law
  • Surgical Ethics
  • Patient Rights

Background:

  • The legal system balances individual and societal needs in conflict resolution.
  • Surgery patients have the right to accept or reject blood transfusions or alternatives.
  • Current legal standards mandate offering and considering transfusion alternatives.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review legal considerations surrounding allogeneic blood transfusions.
  • To examine malpractice and informed consent in transfusion refusal.
  • To provide guidelines for preoperative discussions on transfusion issues.

Main Methods:

  • Review of blood shield laws and malpractice considerations.
  • Analysis of informed consent principles in transfusion medicine.
Keywords:
Legal ApproachProfessional Patient Relationship

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of legal precedents regarding transfusion refusal.

    • Main Results:

    • Allogeneic transfusions are subject to specific legal standards.
    • Informed consent is crucial when alternatives to transfusion exist.
    • Physician-patient discussions must address transfusion risks and alternatives.

    Conclusions:

    • Legal frameworks support patient autonomy in transfusion decisions.
    • Adherence to informed consent and discussion of alternatives is legally mandated.
    • Guidelines are proposed for effective preoperative patient counseling on transfusion.