Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 8, 2026

Vessel-sparing Excision and Primary Anastomosis
Published on: January 7, 2019
Repair of the perineal defect after radical vulvar surgery: direct closure versus skin flaps reconstruction. A
F Landoni1, M Proserpio, A Maneo
1III. Clinica Osterica e Ginecologica-Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy.
Abstract:
From 1987 to 1990, 72 consecutive patients with primary untreated vulvar cancer underwent radical vulvar surgery with skin flaps reconstruction of the perineal defect. Postoperative complications, anatomical and functional results of this group of patients were compared with those of an historical control group of 77 patients submitted, at the same institution, to radical vulvectomy without reconstructive procedure from 1982 through 1986. The time of operation was significantly longer (180 minutes +/- 15 versus 120 minutes +/- 20) (p = 0.05) for patients submitted to the reconstructive procedure, while there was no statistically significant difference in intraoperative blood loss and hospital stay between the 2 groups. In comparison with direct closure, reconstructive procedures resulted in a significant lower rate of wound dehiscences (26% versus 64%) (p = 0.0001), vaginal introitus stenosis (2 versus 8) (p = 0.0001), sexual dysfunction (10% versus 50%) (p = 0.0001) and misdirection of the urinary stream (1 versus 5) (p = 0.001). It was concluded that skin flaps reconstruction is simple, reduces postoperative morbidity, and provides better anatomical and functional results than direct closure of the perineal defect.
More Related Videos
07:57An Experimental Human DIEP Flap Model to Investigate Preservation Strategies for Vascularized Composite Allografts and Free Flaps
Published on: December 5, 2025
04:22Removal of an Intravesical Gellhorn Pessary and Staged Repair of a Residual Large Vesico-Vaginal Fistula
Published on: April 14, 2026