Tendon-healing to cortical bone compared with healing to a cancellous trough. A biomechanical and histological...

This study was performed to test the hypothesis that attaching a tendon to a trough in cancellous bone results in tendon-healing that is biomechanically superior to that after direct fixation of a tendon to cortical bone. Twenty adult female goats were treated with a bilateral tenotomy of the infraspinatus tendon with subsequent reattachment of the tendon. In shoulders randomized to the cancellous-fixation group, a cancellous bed was prepared with a motorized burr and a template measuring twenty by five by five millimeters. The repair in the shoulders randomized to the cortical-fixation group was performed in the same manner, except that the tendon was attached to cortical bone. Three outcome measures were assessed, six and twelve weeks after the repair, with the Student paired t test and analysis of variance: load to failure, energy to failure, and stiffness. The types of repair were not significantly different with regard to any of the three outcomes. When the six and twelve-week data were combined, an average difference in load to failure of 3.9 per cent in favor of cancellous repair was observed but it was not significant (p = 0.78). The associated 95 per cent confidence interval for the difference ranged from 10.5 per cent in favor of cortical repair to 18.3 per cent in favor of cancellous repair. Histological analysis at six and twelve weeks revealed progressive maturation and reorganization of the bone-tendon interface with re-establishment of collagen-fiber continuity between the tendon and bone. This process was indistinguishable between the cortical and cancellous specimens. This study demonstrated no significant benefit from the creation of a trough to expose the tendon to cancellous bone. In this model, at both six and twelve weeks, the tendon-to-bone healing process of the two groups appeared similar and the biomechanical properties were approximately equal.