Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

The categorization of thought disorder

H Berenbaum¹, D Barch

¹Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, Champaign 61820, USA.

Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

|September 1, 1995

Summary

Researchers developed a new system to categorize thought disorder, classifying it into fluency, coherence, content, and social convention disturbances. This new system shows validity in distinguishing thought disorder subtypes in clinical populations.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Cerebellar volume and cerebellocerebral structural covariance in schizophrenia: a multisite mega-analysis of 983 patients and 1349 healthy controls.

Molecular psychiatry·2017

Same author

The Human Connectome Project: a data acquisition perspective.

NeuroImage·2012

Same author

Selective processing of body image words in women at-risk for developing an eating disorder: a preliminary study.

Eating and weight disorders : EWD·2012

Same author

A twin study of individual differences in perceptual asymmetry.

Laterality·2004

Same author

A twin study of alexithymia.

Psychotherapy and psychosomatics·2001

Same author

The development of interpersonal relationships in individuals with schizophrenia.

Psychiatry·2001

Area of Science:

Psychiatry
Linguistics
Psychopathology

Background:

Thought disorder is a core symptom in psychotic disorders.
Existing systems for assessing thought disorder have limitations in capturing the full spectrum of disturbances.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and validate a new, comprehensive system for categorizing thought disorder.
To differentiate between formal and content-based disturbances in thought disorder.

Main Methods:

Study 1: Developed a new categorization system based on speech samples and existing measures (TLC, TDI, BIT) rated by naive judges, clinicians, and linguistic experts.
Study 2: Validated the new system using speech samples from schizophrenic and manic subjects, alongside assessments of symptoms and cognitive performance.

Main Results:

A new system was developed, categorizing thought disorder into disturbances in fluency, discourse coherence, content, and social convention.
The validation phase provided evidence supporting the reliability and utility of the new categorization system in clinical populations.

Conclusions:

The newly developed system offers a more nuanced approach to understanding and classifying thought disorder.
This system has potential applications in research and clinical practice for diagnosing and treating psychotic disorders.

Related Experiment Videos