Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Impedance to defibrillation countershock: does an optimal impedance exist?

B H KenKnight1, B M Eyüboğlu, R E Ideker

  • 1Department of Therapy Research, Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc., St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.

Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology : PACE
|November 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

Electrical impedance in defibrillation is complex, influenced by various factors. Optimizing impedance involves minimizing external resistance while maximizing internal cardiac resistance for effective current delivery.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Mechanisms of electrical defibrillation].

Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie·2009
Same author

[Not Available].

Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie·2009
Same author

Epicardial wavefronts arise from widely distributed transient sources during ventricular fibrillation in the isolated swine heart.

New journal of physics·2008
Same author

[Transvenous parasympathetic nerve stimulation in the chronic myocardial infarction phase].

Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie·2004
Same author

The relationship of defibrillation and stimulation: design implications for the optimum defibrillation waveform.

Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology·2003
Same author

Comparison of the temperature profile and pathological effect at unipolar, bipolar and phased radiofrequency current configurations.

Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing·2001

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Cardiovascular Physiology

Background:

  • Defibrillation relies on transmembrane potential changes from current flow.
  • Electrical impedance is crucial, dictating current magnitude and distribution for a given shock voltage.
  • Impedance comprises extra-tissue, tissue, and electrode-tissue interface resistances, with tissue sources dominating.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of electrical impedance in defibrillation efficacy.
  • To understand how impedance variations affect defibrillation parameters.
  • To determine optimal impedance strategies for defibrillation.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of impedance contributions from different sources (defibrillator, leads, electrodes, intra/extra-cardiac tissue, electrode-tissue interface).
  • Review of experimental data on impedance changes over time (milliseconds to years) in animals and humans.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilizing a boundary element computer model to simulate current distribution and impedance.

    • Main Results:

    • Tissue sources significantly influence overall impedance, contributing to variability.
    • Impedance is not static, changing over various timescales due to electrochemical and physiological mechanisms.
    • Minimizing overall impedance is not always optimal; maximizing intracardiac impedance with minimized external impedance promotes even current distribution.

    Conclusions:

    • Defibrillator design must account for patient-specific impedance variability.
    • Optimal defibrillation shock impedance balances minimized external resistance with maximized intracardiac resistance.
    • Even current distribution, not just minimal impedance, is key for therapeutic efficacy.