Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Involving the public: practical and ethical issues

B Jacobson1, A Bowling

  • 1Department of Public Health, East London, UK.

British Medical Bulletin
|October 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Venous thromboembolism prevention in South Africa: Bridging the gap between guidelines and practice.

South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde·2025
Same author

The Use of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in relatioN to patiEnt risk profilINg (TUNE IN) Wave 3 study.

South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde·2025
Same author

Thrombosis and bleeding outcomes with warfarin conversion to rivaroxaban during the COVID-19 pandemic.

South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde·2025
Same author

Right heart echocardiography findings in hypoxic pneumonia patients during the COVID-19 pandemic in a South African population.

European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice·2024
Same author

Toward an integrated multi-gigahertz ionizing particle diagnostic.

The Review of scientific instruments·2024
Same author

The J&J COVID-19 vaccine: Fit for purpose in our setting.

South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde·2021

This study explores health care rationing debates, surveying public and doctor priorities for health services. It examines the challenges of implementing public input in health care decision-making.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Medical Ethics
  • Public Health Policy

Background:

  • Limited theoretical and methodological discussion exists regarding health care rationing.
  • Health care rationing and prioritization are critical issues in resource allocation.
  • Previous research has not adequately addressed public and professional input in these debates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss the technical, ethical, and political dimensions of health care rationing.
  • To analyze the findings of a public and physician prioritization survey.
  • To explore the implementation challenges of incorporating consultation results into health service policies.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted a survey in the former City and Hackney Health District.
  • Collected public and physician opinions on health service prioritization.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Qualitative analysis of technical, ethical, and political issues.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified key areas of public and physician agreement/disagreement on health service priorities.
    • Highlighted the complexities in translating public preferences into actionable health policies.
    • Revealed significant ethical and political considerations in health care rationing.

    Conclusions:

    • There is a need for greater theoretical and methodological debate on health care rationing.
    • Implementing findings from public consultation exercises presents substantial challenges.
    • Balancing technical, ethical, and political factors is crucial for effective health service prioritization.