Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Information for public choice

S McIver1

  • 1Health Services Management Centre, Birmingham University, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.

British Medical Bulletin
|October 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Public participation in healthcare rationing requires accessible information. While patient involvement in treatment decisions is beneficial, more work is needed to effectively present complex medical data for informed choices.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Australian resident doctors want more palliative medicine education: a survey of attitudes and perceived needs.

Internal medicine journal·2012
Same author

Tape transfer sectioning of tissue microarrays introduces nonspecific immunohistochemical staining artifacts.

Biotechnic & histochemistry : official publication of the Biological Stain Commission·2010
Same author

Between a rock and a hard place: exploring the conflict between respecting the privacy of patients and informing their carers.

Internal medicine journal·2009
Same author

The use of economic evaluations in NHS decision-making: a review and empirical investigation.

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2008
Same author

Addiction.

British medical bulletin·2003
Same author

Preparation and training: the key to better patient involvement.

Quality in health care : QHC·2001
Same journal

Human health in relation to visible, functional, and accessible green space: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of the 3 + 30 + 300 guideline.

British medical bulletin·2026
Same journal

Muscle herniae in exercise-induced leg pain: diagnostic pitfalls and the 'repair paradox'.

British medical bulletin·2026
Same journal

Scaffolds and platelet concentrates in bone regenerative medicine: applications, mechanisms, and future approaches.

British medical bulletin·2026
Same journal

Back squat and deadlift fatiguing protocols elicit distinct countermovement jump profiles: phase-specific predictors and soreness responses.

British medical bulletin·2026
Same journal

Enhancing bone healing through osteogenic medium components: biological roles, mechanisms, and clinical applications.

British medical bulletin·2026
Same journal

Moral injury in healthcare workers: causes & interventions.

British medical bulletin·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Public Health Policy
  • Bioethics

Background:

  • Public engagement in healthcare rationing debates is crucial for informed decision-making.
  • The public participates as both taxpayers and patients, influencing healthcare priorities.
  • Current methods for public involvement in value-based discussions are often inadequate.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the information needs for public participation in healthcare rationing.
  • To identify effective mechanisms for public involvement in healthcare planning and decision-making.
  • To explore patient preferences in treatment choices versus those of health professionals.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review on public engagement strategies in healthcare.
  • Analysis of information requirements for public input in policy discussions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of patient decision-making processes in clinical settings.

    • Main Results:

    • Public involvement in general value discussions is challenging due to information accessibility and processing limitations.
    • Mechanisms for involving the public in service planning are better understood, with clearer information needs.
    • Patients may opt for different treatments than professionals when given more autonomy, highlighting the need for better complex information presentation.

    Conclusions:

    • Effective public participation in healthcare rationing necessitates tailored information strategies.
    • Improving the presentation of complex medical information is vital for empowering patients in shared decision-making.
    • Further research is needed to develop robust methods for patient engagement in treatment and care decisions.